Tristano Vacondio's website serves as a professional portfolio showcasing expertise in marketing, digital media, photography, video production, graphic design, UI/UX, and web design. The site targets a general audience interested in these creative services and positions itself as a niche freelance professional portfolio. The business is small-scale, founded in 2010, and presents a consistent and professional brand image. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with Jetpack integration, hosted by DreamHost, and employs modern web technologies with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks security headers and DNSSEC, indicating room for improvement. Privacy compliance is weak due to the absence of privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site is trustworthy but could enhance compliance and security practices to improve credibility and user trust.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
50
Average
50
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention tristanovacondio.com, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for tristanovacondio.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
The website reflects a solo professional or small business model focused on creative digital services. It leverages a portfolio approach to attract clients in marketing and media sectors. The lack of detailed business information and absence of formal policies suggest a freelance or consultancy operation rather than a large enterprise. The presence of a Twitter social link indicates some social media engagement. The business benefits from a decade-long domain age, supporting its market presence. However, the absence of certifications or formal trust seals limits its competitive advantage in regulated or corporate markets.
Security posture
The website demonstrates basic security hygiene with HTTPS enabled and no visible vulnerabilities in the provided content. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. DNSSEC is not enabled, which could improve DNS security. No incident response or security policy information is available, indicating limited transparency in security management. The absence of a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file further suggests a low maturity level in security governance. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly enhanced by implementing recommended best practices.
Recommendations
Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
Add security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against web vulnerabilities.
Enable DNSSEC for the domain to secure DNS resolution.
Create and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
Enhance accessibility features and conduct an accessibility audit to improve user experience for all users.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
Tristano Vacondio
Description
Experienced marketing professional with a solid background in digital media and web content, offering services in photography, video production and editing, graphic design, UI/UX, and web design.
Key services
Photography, Video production, Video editing, Graphic design, UI, UX, Web design
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent
Technology
Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, Jetpack, MediaElement.js, Google Site Verification, DNS Prefetch, SVG icons
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good
Security
Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
HTTPS enabled
Analytics and tracking
Services
Jetpack Stats
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor
Advertising
Tracking pixels
Jetpack Stats
Marketing tools
Jetpack
Transparency
basic
Site quality
Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate
Key observations
Website is a professional portfolio for an individual marketing and digital media professional.
No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
Contact information is available via email link and contact page but no explicit email address shown in main content.
Uses WordPress CMS with Jetpack plugin for stats and social sharing.
No security headers detected; DNSSEC not enabled.
HTTPS is enabled with valid SSL.
No signs of adult or questionable content.
No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
No incident response or security policy information present.
Technical notes
Notes
The website is built on a modern WordPress platform (version 6.8.3) with Jetpack plugin integration for analytics and social sharing. It uses standard web technologies including CSS, JavaScript, and SVG icons. Hosting is provided by DreamHost, a reputable provider. Performance is moderate with some optimizations possible. Mobile responsiveness is good, and SEO meta tags are properly configured. However, the site lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC, which are technical risks. The site does not expose sensitive data or use vulnerable libraries based on the provided content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small professional portfolio but could benefit from security and performance enhancements.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with tristanovacondio.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tristanovacondio.com.