Skip to main content

Security report for tripan.be

Tripan · Manufacturing · Belgium

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 1 other check.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Tripan is a Belgian prefab concrete manufacturer specializing in custom solutions primarily for industrial and utility construction sectors. With over 30 years of market presence and a reputation for quality and flexibility, Tripan serves construction companies and architects, leveraging its own production and transport capabilities. The company is part of the Willy Naessens Group, enhancing its market credibility. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and provides clear contact information and certifications, supporting its business legitimacy. Technically, the site runs on WordPress with modern plugins and uses HTTPS with Google Analytics configured for IP anonymization. Security posture is solid but could be improved with additional headers and explicit security policies. WHOIS data is restricted, limiting transparency but not detracting significantly from trust due to other positive indicators. Overall, Tripan presents a credible and professional digital presence aligned with its business operations.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tripan.be

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
43
Average
52
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Tripan operates in the manufacturing sector focused on prefab concrete elements for industrial and utility buildings. Its business model is project-based manufacturing with a strong emphasis on customization and quality. The company targets construction firms and architects, positioning itself as a reliable partner with over three decades of experience. The affiliation with the Willy Naessens Group provides strategic advantages and market trust. Certifications such as ISO 14001 and BREEAM-NL demonstrate commitment to quality and sustainability. The website content and structure reflect a mature business with clear service offerings and contact channels, supporting customer engagement and lead generation.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS with a good SSL configuration and employs Google Analytics with privacy-conscious settings. A cookie consent mechanism is implemented, indicating GDPR awareness. However, the absence of key security headers (e.g., CSP, HSTS) and lack of published security or incident response policies represent gaps in security maturity. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The WHOIS data restriction reduces transparency but is not uncommon. Overall, the security posture is moderate with room for improvement in policy transparency and technical hardening.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish explicit security and incident response policies on the website to improve transparency and user trust.
  3. Consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly review and update privacy and cookie policies to maintain GDPR compliance and reflect any changes in data processing.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Tripan
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Tripan
Description
Tripan is een prefab betonfabrikant gespecialiseerd in maatwerk, hoofdzakelijk voor industriebouw en utiliteitsbouw.
Key services
Prefab beton productie, Maatwerk betonpanelen, Transport en plaatsing prefab beton
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, Enfold Theme 5.2.1, jQuery 3.7.1, Google Fonts, Yoast SEO plugin
Frameworks
WordPress CMS
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google Analytics anonymize IP enabled
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Dutch language
  2. Professional design with clear navigation and responsive layout
  3. No visible security blocking or WAF challenges
  4. WHOIS data is restricted, limiting domain ownership transparency
  5. Contact information is clearly provided with company domain emails and phone numbers
  6. Certifications and parent company affiliation add trustworthiness
  7. Google Analytics is used with IP anonymization
  8. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented
  9. No explicit terms of service or security policy pages found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 using the Enfold theme and Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a modern and widely supported CMS platform. It uses jQuery 3.7.1 and Google Fonts for frontend styling. Performance is moderate with responsive design and mobile optimization evident. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. No major technical debt or deprecated libraries were detected. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site could benefit from enhanced accessibility and additional security hardening measures.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tripan.be. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tripan.be.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.