Skip to main content

Security report for triniti.eu

Triniti · Other · Estonia

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Triniti is a Pan-Baltic law firm offering comprehensive legal advisory services with a team of over 90 professionals. The website targets businesses and clients in the Baltic region seeking legal expertise in corporate law, intellectual property, and sustainability among other areas. The firm positions itself as a trusted and awarded legal service provider with a professional online presence. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern SEO and analytics tools such as Yoast SEO, Google Analytics, and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. The site is mobile optimized and uses structured data for enhanced search engine visibility. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and employs monitoring tools like New Relic, but lacks explicit security headers and published privacy or terms documents. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but could improve privacy compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of triniti.eu. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching triniti.eu

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
83
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention triniti.eu, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for triniti.eu right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Triniti operates as a regional law firm in the Pan-Baltic area, focusing on corporate and intellectual property law, sustainability, and pro bono programs for startups. The firm leverages digital marketing and SEO to reach its target audience of businesses and legal clients. The multilingual support and structured data indicate a mature digital strategy. The absence of explicit contact details in the analyzed content suggests contact information may be located on other pages. The firm’s use of analytics and cookie consent tools reflects awareness of GDPR and data privacy regulations. No suspicious or privacy-protected WHOIS data supports the legitimacy of the business.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS enabled and integration of monitoring tools like New Relic. Cookie consent is actively managed via Cookiebot, indicating compliance efforts. However, the lack of visible security headers (e.g., CSP, HSTS) and absence of published privacy policy or terms of service documents are gaps. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response contacts are found, which could be improved to enhance security transparency and readiness. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement and configure security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Add visible contact information including security incident response contacts and data protection officer details if applicable.
  4. Consider publishing a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins for security vulnerabilities and update them promptly.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Triniti
Description
Pan-Baltic legal advisory team with more than 90 professionals in the team, ready to drive you to success. Let's start project together!
Key services
Legal advisory, Corporate law, Intellectual property law, Sustainability consulting, Pro bono programs for startups
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, Google Analytics, Cookiebot, jQuery, Select2, Magnific Popup, New Relic Browser monitoring
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • Use of security monitoring via New Relic

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, New Relic Browser
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Cookiebot, AddEvent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich for a legal services firm.
  2. Cookie consent is implemented with Cookiebot, indicating GDPR awareness.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the main HTML content.
  4. No visible contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided HTML snippet.
  5. Use of multiple analytics and monitoring tools including Google Analytics and New Relic.
  6. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; full content accessible.
  7. Structured data (JSON-LD) is implemented for SEO and rich snippets.
  8. Multiple language alternates provided indicating multilingual support.
  9. No explicit security headers found in the HTML content; recommend adding.
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Select2, Magnific Popup, and New Relic for performance monitoring. SEO is enhanced with Yoast SEO plugin and structured data in JSON-LD format. Cookie consent is managed by Cookiebot, supporting GDPR compliance. The site loads multiple external scripts from trusted domains and uses Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. Accessibility features are basic but present. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced security headers and privacy documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 58/100Medium31 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with triniti.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review triniti.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.