Skip to main content

Security report for trelawnyspt.com

Trelawny · Manufacturing · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS and Security headers.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Trelawny is a UK-based manufacturer specializing in pneumatic tools and surface preparation equipment, operating since 1997 and part of the Indutrade Group. The company targets industrial and commercial sectors, emphasizing sustainability and innovation with a clear market position as a specialist manufacturer. Their digital presence is built on a modern WordPress CMS with WooCommerce, integrating marketing and analytics tools such as HubSpot and Google Analytics. The website demonstrates good content quality, professional design, and clear navigation, supporting a positive user experience. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforcement and cookie consent mechanisms, though there is room for improvement in security headers and incident response transparency. Overall, the website and domain registration data indicate a trustworthy and credible business with a medium-sized operational scale.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching trelawnyspt.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Trelawny holds a strong position in the manufacturing sector, focusing on niche industrial tools and surface preparation equipment. Their business model includes direct manufacturing, distribution through Amazon and distributors, and a focus on sustainability aligned with Netzero2030 goals. The company benefits from being part of the larger Indutrade Group, which enhances credibility and market reach. Their digital marketing ecosystem leverages HubSpot and social media channels effectively. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers suggests a preference for controlled contact via forms, which may streamline lead management. The company maintains compliance with GDPR and provides comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, reflecting a mature approach to data protection.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses clientTransferProhibited domain status, indicating basic domain security. Cookie consent is implemented with granular user controls, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of a published security policy or incident response contacts represent gaps in security maturity. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The use of third-party scripts like HubSpot and CookieYes is standard but requires ongoing monitoring for security risks. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by adopting additional best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen browser security.
  2. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  3. Publish a security.txt file to provide clear vulnerability disclosure and incident response information.
  4. Add explicit security policy and incident response contact channels on the website to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Trelawny
Description
Manufacturer of pneumatic tools and surface preparation equipment based in Leamington Spa, UK. Part of the Indutrade Group, Sweden. Focus on sustainability and Netzero2030 goals.
Key services
Manufacture of pneumatic tools, Surface preparation equipment, Product warranty and support, Distribution via Amazon and distributors
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 7.0, WooCommerce 10.8.1, Nectar Blocks plugin, HubSpot scripts, CookieYes consent management, jQuery 3.7.1
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WooCommerce
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, HubSpot Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
HubSpot Ads Pixel
Marketing tools
HubSpot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses modern WordPress CMS with WooCommerce for e-commerce capabilities
  2. Cookie consent is implemented with detailed categories and user control
  3. Multiple social media profiles linked and active
  4. No direct email addresses or phone numbers found in the HTML content; contact likely via contact form
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response information published
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page found
  7. Good SEO and metadata implementation including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 7.0 with WooCommerce 10.8.1, leveraging Nectar Blocks for content and HubSpot for marketing automation. The presence of modern fonts, responsive design, and SEO plugins like Yoast indicates a well-maintained technical infrastructure. Performance is moderate with room for optimization, particularly in loading times and accessibility features. The site uses multiple external scripts for analytics, marketing, and cookie management, which are industry standard but require careful management to avoid performance and security issues. Hosting details are not explicit, but domain registration is stable and long-standing. Overall, the technical setup supports business goals effectively but could benefit from enhanced security and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with trelawnyspt.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review trelawnyspt.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.