Skip to main content

Security report for treasuryfinland.fi

State Treasury · Government · Finland

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The State Treasury website serves as the official portal for Finland's central government debt management. It provides comprehensive information on government borrowing, debt statistics, auctions, investor relations, and sustainability initiatives. The site targets investors, government officials, and the public interested in Finland's fiscal management. The business model is that of a government agency managing public debt and liquidity, with a strong market position as the authoritative source for this information in Finland. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern libraries such as jQuery, Chart.js, and Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices, with a professional design and clear navigation. Performance is moderate, with no critical technical issues detected. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent mechanisms, indicating good privacy compliance. However, explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy are not clearly present, and no dedicated security or incident response policies are published. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected, and the WHOIS data confirms the legitimacy and consistency of the domain as a Finnish government entity. Overall, the website is trustworthy, professional, and compliant with privacy regulations, with room for improvement in explicit security policy publication and enhanced security headers. The risk level is low, but strategic enhancements in security posture and transparency would further strengthen trust and resilience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching treasuryfinland.fi

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention treasuryfinland.fi, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for treasuryfinland.fi right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The State Treasury operates as a critical government agency responsible for managing Finland's central government debt and liquidity. Its market positioning is strong as the official source for debt issuance, auctions, and investor relations. The business model is non-commercial, focused on public financial management. Revenue streams are government-funded, with services including debt issuance, cash management, and reporting. The target customers include institutional investors, financial markets participants, and government stakeholders. Growth indicators include regular publication of reviews and statistics, and active engagement with credit rating agencies. The partnership ecosystem includes language-specific sister sites and financial market participants. Strategic observations highlight the importance of transparency, compliance, and investor confidence in its operations.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms in place, reflecting compliance with GDPR and privacy best practices. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and a published security policy or incident response contact reduces the overall security maturity. The site does not provide a security.txt or vulnerability disclosure program, which are recommended for transparency and rapid incident handling. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager is managed with consent, but continuous monitoring is advised. Overall, the security posture is good but can be enhanced by formalizing security policies and improving header configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Referrer-Policy to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page including incident response procedures and contact information for security issues.
  3. Add a security.txt file at the root domain to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to prevent potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance form security by integrating CAPTCHA or other anti-bot mechanisms to prevent automated abuse.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
State Treasury
Registration number
0245440-1
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
State Treasury
Description
The State Treasury is responsible for Finland’s central government borrowing as well as debt and liquidity management.
Key services
Central government debt management, Cash management, Auctions of Treasury bills and bonds, Investor relations, Statistics and reporting
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, mmenu, Chart.js, Gravity Forms, Google Tag Manager, Yoast SEO, Power BI embed
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager with consent
  • No visible vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a government official site for Finland's State Treasury.
  2. Content is comprehensive and professionally presented.
  3. Strong compliance with privacy and cookie regulations.
  4. No signs of blocking or WAF interference.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices.
  6. Contact information is clear but no direct email addresses found in HTML.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  8. Social media presence limited to Twitter and LinkedIn.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using modern JavaScript libraries including jQuery, Chart.js, and mmenu for UI components. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking, integrated with a cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations. The site uses responsive design techniques and accessibility features, providing a good user experience across devices. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization in loading times and script management. The technical stack is well-maintained with no deprecated or vulnerable libraries detected. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and formalize security policies to reduce technical risks impacting business operations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with treasuryfinland.fi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review treasuryfinland.fi.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.