Skip to main content

Security report for traxjh.com

Trax JH Ltd · Manufacturing · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Trax JH Ltd is a UK-based manufacturer specializing in automotive balance weights, recognized as a leader in innovation and design within the industry. The company exports internationally and holds multiple ISO certifications, underscoring its commitment to quality and compliance. The website reflects a professional but basic digital presence built on Drupal 7, with standard tracking and cookie consent mechanisms implemented. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA in place, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit incident response information. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy, though the business content and certifications support authenticity. Overall, the site is functional but could benefit from modernization and enhanced transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching traxjh.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
40
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the manufacturing sector, focusing on Original Equipment and aftermarket balance weights for the automotive industry. Its market position is that of an established innovator with a medium-sized footprint and international reach. The business model centers on product design, manufacturing, and export. Partnerships with companies like Wegmann Automotive and DX Digital Ltd indicate a collaborative ecosystem. The website content is minimal but consistent with the brand's messaging and certifications. Growth indicators include ongoing product innovation and international distribution.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA, indicating baseline security awareness. However, the use of an outdated jQuery version and lack of security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS reduce the overall security maturity. No public security policy or incident response contacts were found, which limits transparency and preparedness perception. Cookie consent is implemented with opt-in, supporting GDPR compliance. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis.

Recommendations

  1. Implement modern security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Upgrade jQuery and other JavaScript libraries to current supported versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Add direct company contact information such as verified emails and phone numbers to facilitate communication and support.
  5. Enhance SEO and accessibility features to improve user experience and search engine ranking.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Trax JH Ltd
Description
Trax JH Ltd is one of Europe’s largest balance weight producers specializing in design and manufacture of weights to Original Equipment specifications, exporting to over 25 countries with brand recognition for design, quality and service.
Key services
Design and manufacture of balance weights, Original Equipment supply, Aftermarket product supply
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.12, Drupal 7, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
Drupal 7 CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Google reCAPTCHA implemented
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF detected
  2. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is unusual
  3. Website uses Drupal 7 CMS with legacy jQuery version
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present with opt-in consent
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage
  6. Certifications and industry approvals are prominently mentioned
  7. Google Analytics and Tag Manager used for tracking
  8. No security.txt or explicit incident response info found
  9. Content is minimal on homepage but business info is clear
  10. Social media presence limited to LinkedIn
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal 7 CMS with jQuery 1.12, indicating legacy technology usage. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are integrated for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile responsive with basic accessibility features. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected. The absence of advanced SEO metadata and structured data limits search optimization. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content. Technical debt is evident in outdated libraries and missing security headers, suggesting opportunities for modernization and improved security posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with traxjh.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review traxjh.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.