Skip to main content

Security report for travelgirls.com

TM Solutions Limited · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Travelgirls.com is an established online travel dating platform operated by TM Solutions Limited, targeting adventurous travelers seeking travel partners and romantic connections. The site has been active since 2010 and boasts a community of over three million members. It offers services such as travel partner matching, community networking, and trip sharing. The platform is designed with a modern React-based frontend and integrates Google reCAPTCHA and Facebook SDK for security and social login features. Privacy and cookie policies are present and indicate GDPR compliance, although direct contact information and detailed security policies are not publicly available. The security posture is moderate with HTTPS enforced but lacks explicit security headers and published incident response details. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which raises concerns about domain registration transparency despite the professional appearance of the website. Overall, the site provides a niche service with good content quality and user experience but would benefit from enhanced security disclosures and contact transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching travelgirls.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
20
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Travelgirls.com operates in the niche market of travel-related dating and social networking, serving a mature audience interested in combining travel with romantic or friendship connections. The business model revolves around membership and community engagement, leveraging a large user base to maintain market position. The company TM Solutions Limited is the legal entity behind the site, but no additional subsidiaries or partners were identified. The platform uses modern web technologies and integrates with major social platforms for login and tracking. Growth indicators include a large member base and longevity since 2010. However, the lack of WHOIS transparency and limited public contact information may impact trust and credibility. The site’s marketing relies on social media and Google services, with moderate tracking and advertising transparency.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Google reCAPTCHA v3 to mitigate automated abuse, indicating a baseline security awareness. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The site lacks published security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure programs, which are important for mature security governance. GDPR compliance is indicated through privacy and cookie policies, but no data protection officer contact was found. The missing WHOIS data is a significant concern for domain legitimacy and trust. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be improved with better transparency and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive security headers including CSP, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Provide clear contact information for security incidents, including a dedicated security or abuse email address and an incident response policy.
  3. Enhance transparency by publishing data protection officer contact details and a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  4. Improve accessibility features to meet compliance standards and broaden user inclusivity.
  5. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data issue to improve domain registration transparency and trustworthiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
TM Solutions Limited
Description
Travelgirls is a travel dating site started in 2010 with over three million members. It offers a platform to meet adventurous girls who want to travel, find friends worldwide, visit dream countries, guide visitors, and meet soulmates to share trips.
Key services
Travel partner matching, Community for travelers, Travel dating, Trip planning and social networking
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Google reCAPTCHA v3, Facebook SDK, Google Identity Services
Frameworks
React
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 for bot protection
  • Facebook SDK integration with async loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (implied by gtag.js), Facebook Pixel (implied by Facebook SDK)
Marketing tools
Google reCAPTCHA, Facebook SDK
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data is missing or domain is unregistered in the queried database.
  3. Site uses modern web technologies including React and Google/Facebook integrations.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  5. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found on the landing page.
  6. Security headers are minimal or not explicitly declared.
  7. Content is focused on travel dating with a mature audience.
  8. No explicit adult content but dating context places it in questionable content safety category.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using React, leveraging modern JavaScript frameworks and libraries. It integrates Google Fonts for typography and Google reCAPTCHA v3 for bot mitigation. Facebook SDK is used for social login and tracking. The site loads asynchronously and defers scripts to optimize performance. The manifest and favicon setup indicate attention to mobile and PWA capabilities. However, no CMS or hosting provider information is directly discernible. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured content. Technical debt appears low but could be improved by adding security headers and enhancing accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with travelgirls.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review travelgirls.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.