Skip to main content

Security report for transpornsites.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Email security, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.transpornsites.com operates as a niche adult content directory specializing in trans and shemale pornographic sites. It provides categorized listings and affiliate links to various adult content providers, targeting adult audiences interested in this specific genre. The business model appears to be primarily affiliate marketing and advertising-based, with no direct content hosting. Technically, the site is built on WordPress and utilizes common web technologies such as Bootstrap, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Algolia for search insights. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and offers a generally good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and transparency. Security posture is basic, with HTTPS enabled but lacking important security headers and policies. Privacy compliance is poor, with no visible privacy or cookie policies, and no contact or incident response information is provided. Overall, the site presents moderate risk due to lack of transparency and limited security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching transpornsites.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
75
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The site occupies a niche segment within the adult entertainment industry, focusing on trans and shemale content. Its competitive advantage lies in aggregating and categorizing a wide range of adult sites, potentially driving traffic through affiliate links. The business model relies on advertising and affiliate commissions, targeting adult consumers seeking specialized content. There is no evidence of direct content creation or hosting, reducing operational complexity. The lack of company information, contact details, and certifications limits trust and may hinder growth or partnerships. The site’s ecosystem includes integration with major analytics and marketing tools, indicating some level of digital maturity. However, the absence of WHOIS data and privacy policies may affect reputation and compliance with regulations such as GDPR.

Security posture

Security maturity is low to moderate. The site uses HTTPS, which is mandatory for secure communications. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or X-Content-Type-Options were detected, which are important for mitigating common web vulnerabilities. There is no evidence of a security.txt file or incident response contact information, limiting the ability to handle vulnerability disclosures effectively. The site includes multiple third-party scripts for analytics and marketing, which may introduce risks if not regularly audited. Privacy compliance is lacking, with no visible cookie consent mechanisms or privacy policies, exposing the site to regulatory risks. Overall, the security posture requires significant improvements to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance and implement a cookie consent mechanism.
  3. Provide transparent contact information including a dedicated security or abuse contact email.
  4. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to minimize security risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
A website listing and reviewing trans and shemale porn sites, providing categorized links and information about adult content sites.
Key services
Listing of trans porn sites, Reviews and ratings of adult sites, Affiliate links to partner sites
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Algolia Search Insights, Bootstrap 3.3.7, WPRocket Lazy Load Scripts
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Algolia Insights
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Algolia Insights
Marketing tools
Algolia Search
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult content directory focused on trans and shemale porn sites.
  2. No WHOIS registration data available, raising legitimacy concerns.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies detected.
  4. No contact information or security policies found.
  5. Uses common analytics and tracking scripts.
  6. No security headers detected in provided data.
  7. Mobile optimized with responsive design.
  8. No forms detected in the provided HTML content.
  9. No social media links or company contact emails found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with Bootstrap 3.3.7 for styling and layout. It integrates Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, and Algolia Insights for analytics and search functionality. The site uses lazy loading scripts to optimize performance. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design elements. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and canonical URLs. However, the site lacks advanced frameworks or modern JavaScript libraries beyond analytics and search. Hosting provider details are not available. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in script management and caching. Accessibility features are basic, with room for enhancement to meet WCAG standards. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but could benefit from modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with transpornsites.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review transpornsites.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.