Skip to main content

Security report for translemanique.ch

Translémanique en Solitaire · Other · Switzerland

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Translémanique en Solitaire is a well-established sailing regatta event held on Lake Léman, Switzerland, since 1974. The website serves as the official platform for event information, participant details, news updates, and multimedia galleries. It targets professional and amateur sailors interested in solo sailing competitions on the lake. The business model revolves around organizing and promoting this sporting event, with partnerships for registration and media coverage. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins and optimizations, ensuring fast performance, mobile responsiveness, and good SEO practices. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement, cookie consent, and use of security monitoring tools, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not published. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with privacy regulations, making it a reliable source for its audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, YouTube, Cloudflare, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching translemanique.ch

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
60
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The event holds a prominent position in the regional sailing community, attracting top solo sailors on Lake Léman. Its longevity and consistent branding reinforce its market presence. Revenue streams likely include participant registration fees, sponsorships, and media rights. The partnership with Manage2Sail for registrations indicates a strategic collaboration to streamline event management. The website content and structure support community engagement and information dissemination, with regular news and multimedia updates. Growth potential exists in expanding digital engagement and enhancing online services for participants and spectators.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS, security headers, and integration of monitoring tools like Sentry. Cookie consent mechanisms align with GDPR requirements, and privacy policies are comprehensive. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy or vulnerability disclosure page limits transparency. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. Incident response readiness is unclear due to missing contact channels for security issues. Overall, the site maintains good security hygiene but could improve transparency and incident handling communication.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and user guidance.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program with a security.txt file.
  3. Add explicit incident response contact information for security issues.
  4. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance contact information availability to improve user trust and support.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Translémanique en Solitaire
Description
Véritable laboratoire de technologie depuis 1939, il est la vitrine de la voile suisse, réunissant navigateurs professionnels et amateurs sur un même parcours: de Genève au Bouveret et retour, soit 123 km autour du lac léman. La Translémanique en Solitaire est une régate en solitaire sur le lac Léman, ouverte aux voiliers monocoques de régate et de course-croisière, organisée depuis 1974.
Key services
Organisation de régate en solitaire, Publication d'actualités et classements, Galerie photos et vidéos, Informations pour concurrents et spectateurs
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WPBakery Page Builder, Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, jQuery, Envira Gallery, WP Rocket
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (e.g., WP Sentry)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Sentry
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well maintained.
  2. Content is rich and relevant to the sailing community.
  3. Strong SEO and structured data implementation.
  4. Good privacy and cookie compliance.
  5. No visible security or privacy red flags.
  6. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found on the homepage.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and performance optimizations.
Technical notes

Notes

The website leverages WordPress CMS with WPBakery Page Builder and Yoast SEO for content management and optimization. Performance is enhanced by WP Rocket caching and lazy loading techniques. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing integrations. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations. Structured data using JSON-LD improves search engine understanding. No major technical debt or outdated technologies were identified. Hosting provider details are not explicit but the site shows good uptime and speed. Opportunities exist to further modernize by adopting newer JavaScript frameworks or headless CMS approaches for scalability.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with translemanique.ch. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review translemanique.ch.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.