Skip to main content

Security report for translations.lv

Tulkošanas birojs «Tatjana Judina un partneri» · Other · Latvia

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Tulkošanas birojs «Tatjana Judina un partneri» is a small, established translation service provider based in Riga, Latvia, with over 21 years of experience. The company specializes in certified translations, document translations, legal and technical translations, targeting a general audience requiring professional language services. The website is built on WordPress with a Foundation CSS framework, incorporating Google Fonts and Google Analytics for tracking. The site is mobile-optimized and presents a professional design with clear navigation and relevant content. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and secure cookie settings; however, the absence of security headers and explicit privacy policies indicates room for improvement. No WHOIS data was available due to query limits, but the website content and presentation suggest legitimacy. Overall, the site demonstrates moderate digital maturity with basic privacy compliance and business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching translations.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the language services sector, focusing on translation and certification services primarily in Latvian and Russian languages. The company has a localized market presence in Latvia, with a business model centered on service provision to individuals and organizations needing certified and specialized translations. The website content and structure indicate a stable, small-sized enterprise with a consistent brand image and a focus on quality and client deadlines. The lack of detailed contact information and privacy policies may limit trust for some users. The company leverages Google Analytics for user insights but does not appear to engage in extensive marketing or advertising partnerships. No related or partner domains were identified.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses secure cookie attributes, which are positive security practices. However, the absence of common security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces the overall security posture. No explicit security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present, which could hinder effective security management and user trust. The site does not expose sensitive data or show signs of vulnerabilities in the analyzed content. GDPR compliance is partial, with a cookie consent banner present but no clear privacy policy. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be enhanced by implementing recommended headers, policies, and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for general and security-related inquiries.
  4. Consider publishing a security.txt file and establishing a vulnerability disclosure process to improve security posture and transparency.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security audits to maintain and improve website security and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Tulkošanas birojs «Tatjana Judina un partneri»
Description
Tulkošanas birojs Rīgas centrā. Eiropas valodas, apliecinājums.
Key services
Tulkojums ar apliecinājumu, Dokumentu tulkošana, Juridisks tulkojums, Tehnisks tulkojums
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, WordPress, Foundation framework (CSS classes and meta tags), Google Fonts
Frameworks
Foundation
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie set with Secure and SameSite=Lax attributes
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
  3. Website uses HTTPS with secure cookie settings and cookie consent banner.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  6. Social media presence includes Facebook page linked via Open Graph meta tag.
  7. Website content is in Latvian with Russian language alternate version.
  8. Business is a small translation bureau with over 21 years of experience.
  9. Technical stack includes WordPress CMS, Foundation CSS framework, Google Fonts, and Google Analytics.
  10. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with the Foundation CSS framework, utilizing Google Fonts and Google Analytics. The site is mobile responsive and well-structured with proper meta tags and SEO optimizations. Performance is moderate, with minified CSS and JS assets indicating some optimization efforts. However, no hosting provider information was detected. The site lacks advanced accessibility features and security headers, which are technical debt areas. The use of Google Analytics indicates moderate user tracking, but no advanced marketing or advertising tools were found. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small business but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with translations.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review translations.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.