Skip to main content

Security report for transgendersurgeri.es

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website transgendersurgeri.es serves as a personal archive platform titled "Lexi's Archive" that hosts various directories and files intended for private use. It employs a password-protected mechanism to restrict downloads, indicating a focus on controlled access rather than public business operations. The site lacks any business branding, contact information, or commercial content, positioning it as a personal or small group resource rather than a commercial entity. Technically, the site is built with basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, utilizing the Fira Mono font and a third-party analytics script from lea.pet. The design is minimalistic with basic mobile responsiveness and limited SEO optimization. No CMS or advanced frameworks are detected. The site does not display any privacy or cookie policies, nor does it provide contact or legal information, which limits its compliance posture. From a security perspective, the site uses a numeric key-based password protection for downloads and sets cookies with SameSite=Strict attributes, which is a positive practice. However, there is no visible enforcement of HTTPS or security headers, and no privacy or cookie consent mechanisms are present. The WHOIS data is inaccessible due to Red.es restrictions, preventing verification of domain registration details and reducing trustworthiness. No WAF or blocking mechanisms are detected, and the content is accessible without challenge. Overall, the site scores low on business credibility and privacy compliance, with moderate technical implementation and security posture. It is safe in terms of content, containing no adult or explicit material. Strategic recommendations include implementing HTTPS, publishing privacy and cookie policies, adding contact information, and enhancing security headers to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching transgendersurgeri.es

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website does not represent a commercial business but rather a personal archive. There is no identifiable company name, legal entity, or business model. The target audience appears to be the site owner or a small private group with access to password-protected files. There are no indications of revenue streams, partnerships, or market positioning. The use of a third-party analytics service suggests some interest in visitor metrics but no marketing or sales infrastructure is evident. The lack of business information and policies indicates minimal operational maturity.

Security posture

Security maturity is basic. The site employs a password mechanism for downloads and uses secure cookie attributes, which are positive controls. However, the absence of HTTPS enforcement, security headers, and privacy policies are significant gaps. The lack of contact information and incident response channels further reduces security readiness. No vulnerabilities are explicitly visible, but the minimal security controls and lack of compliance documentation suggest a low security posture. The WHOIS data unavailability adds uncertainty to domain legitimacy and trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure all communications.
  2. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies to comply with data protection regulations.
  3. Provide contact information to enhance trust and enable communication.
  4. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options to improve security posture.
  5. Establish an incident response contact or security policy page to demonstrate readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Personal archive website hosting various files and directories for private use.
Key services
File hosting for personal archive, Password-protected downloads
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Fira Mono font, lea.pet analytics script
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100
Good practices seen
  • Password protection for downloads via numeric key
  • SameSite=Strict cookie attribute used

Analytics and tracking

Services
lea.pet
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
lea.pet
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is a personal archive with password-protected downloads.
  2. No business or contact information provided.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. Minimal SEO and accessibility features.
  5. Uses a third-party analytics script from lea.pet.
  6. WHOIS data is not publicly accessible due to Red.es restrictions.
  7. No signs of WAF or security blocking mechanisms.
  8. No adult or explicit content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a simple static HTML structure with embedded CSS and JavaScript. The font usage is customized with Fira Mono variants. A third-party analytics script from lea.pet is included for visitor tracking. There is no evidence of a CMS or server-side frameworks. Performance is moderate with basic mobile responsiveness. SEO is minimal with only a noindex robots meta tag present. Accessibility features are basic, with no ARIA roles or landmarks detected. The site lacks modern technical enhancements such as structured data or Open Graph metadata.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with transgendersurgeri.es. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review transgendersurgeri.es.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.