Skip to main content

Security report for transformers.lv

Transformers.lv · Other · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

44/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Transformers.lv is a Latvian-based entertainment service specializing in robot transformer shows for various events including private parties, corporate functions, and promotional campaigns. The company offers unique, professionally executed performances featuring large robot costumes, special effects, and interactive scenarios tailored to client needs. Their market position is that of a leading provider of such entertainment in Latvia, with a focus on family-friendly and corporate audiences. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Avada theme and includes common plugins such as Yoast SEO for optimization, Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel for tracking, and ManyChat for user engagement. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO practices and multimedia content including videos and galleries. However, the WordPress version is outdated, which may pose security risks. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, the absence of security headers and lack of explicit privacy and cookie policies indicate room for improvement in compliance and security best practices. The WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy front for its niche entertainment business but should enhance its privacy compliance and security measures to improve trust and reduce risk.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching transformers.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
44

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Transformers.lv operates in the event entertainment sector, focusing on robot transformer shows that appeal to families, corporate clients, and promotional event organizers. Their competitive advantage lies in offering large-scale, visually impressive robot performances with interactive elements and special effects. Revenue streams likely include event bookings, special effects rentals, and promotional appearances. The company maintains active social media channels to engage audiences and promote services. Growth indicators include regular content updates and video showcases. The partnership ecosystem includes social media platforms and video hosting services but no direct business partners were identified from the data. Strategic observations suggest the company could benefit from enhanced digital security and clearer privacy policies to strengthen market credibility.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. HTTPS is properly implemented, and no exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security posture. There are no visible incident response or security policy documents, and privacy compliance is minimal with no cookie consent mechanism. The website uses outdated WordPress core version 4.9.4, which may expose it to known vulnerabilities. The business impact of these gaps includes potential data privacy issues and increased risk of exploitation. Compliance gaps with GDPR are evident due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not present. Overall, the site requires improvements in security best practices and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Update WordPress core and all plugins/themes to the latest versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with a visible consent mechanism to comply with GDPR.
  3. Add essential security headers (CSP, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, HSTS) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  4. Develop and publish a security policy and incident response plan accessible to users and stakeholders.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing to identify and remediate vulnerabilities proactively.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Transformers.lv
Description
Provides robot transformer shows and entertainment services for private, corporate, and promotional events. Offers interactive robot performances with special effects and tailored scenarios.
Key services
Private event robot shows, Corporate event entertainment, Promotional event robot performances, Special effects equipment rental
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 4.9.4, Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery 1.12.4, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Google Tag Manager, ManyChat widget, FontAwesome icons
Frameworks
Avada WordPress Theme
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • No vulnerable libraries detected in scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Yandex Metrika
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Yandex Metrika
Marketing tools
ManyChat
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found
  4. Contact phone number clearly displayed and consistent
  5. Multiple social media profiles linked and active
  6. Uses standard WordPress CMS with common plugins and theme
  7. No security headers detected in provided data
  8. HTTPS is enabled and used site-wide
  9. No signs of adult or questionable content
  10. Good SEO metadata and structured data present
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS version 4.9.4 with the Avada theme and uses several common plugins including Yoast SEO, Contact Form 7, and ManyChat. The tech stack includes jQuery 1.12.4 and various tracking scripts from Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Yandex Metrika. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO metadata and structured data (JSON-LD) for enhanced search engine visibility. Performance is moderate, with multiple external scripts that may impact load times. The site lacks modern security headers and uses an outdated WordPress version, indicating technical debt and potential security risks. There is no explicit hosting provider information. Overall, the infrastructure is standard for small to medium WordPress sites but requires modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with transformers.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review transformers.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.