Skip to main content

Security report for transaction-network.com

Transaction-Network · Manufacturing · Germany

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Transaction-Network operates a digital service ecosystem targeted at industrial producers, aiming to reduce downtime and improve supply reliability. The company positions itself as a neutral platform for manufacturers, offering structured and ready-to-use digital services. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and SEO-friendly, reflecting a mature digital presence. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, HubSpot, and Cookiebot for privacy compliance. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts are absent. The WHOIS data is missing or inaccessible, which raises some concerns about domain legitimacy, but the active and professional website mitigates this risk. Overall, the site scores well on content quality and privacy compliance but could improve business credibility and transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Domain Expires Soon

      Domain expires in 6 days

      What to do: Renew domain registration before expiration

  4. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching transaction-network.com

This scan found 18 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
100
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
83
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention transaction-network.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for transaction-network.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets the manufacturing sector with a B2B digital service platform designed to enhance operational efficiency. Its market positioning as a neutral service ecosystem suggests a strategy focused on broad industry adoption rather than niche specialization. The integration of marketing and analytics tools indicates a data-driven approach to customer engagement and growth. The absence of direct contact information on the homepage may reflect a controlled lead generation strategy via forms or partner channels. The company appears medium-sized, founded around 2021, with no visible parent or subsidiary relationships. The website's consistent branding and comprehensive content support a strong professional image.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and employs cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR requirements, demonstrating a commitment to user privacy and security. However, the lack of explicit security headers and absence of published security policies or incident response contacts indicate areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of reputable third-party services like Cloudflare (implied), HubSpot, and Cookiebot adds layers of security and compliance. The missing WHOIS data is a notable risk factor, potentially impacting trust and domain legitimacy assessments.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  2. Implement and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data to improve domain legitimacy and trust.
  4. Enhance business credibility by providing verified contact details and company registration information.
  5. Maintain and regularly update privacy and cookie policies to ensure ongoing GDPR compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Transaction-Network
Description
Das digitale Service-Ökosystem von Transaction-Network ist herstellerneutral, strukturiert und sofort einsatzbereit. Es richtet sich an Produzenten, die Ausfälle reduzieren und ihre Liefertreue sichern wollen.
Key services
Digital service ecosystem, Reducing production downtime, Supply reliability enhancement
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, WPBakery Page Builder, Yoast SEO Premium, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Cloudflare (implied by cookies and scripts), FontAwesome
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, HubSpot Analytics, Leadinfo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
HubSpot, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Cookiebot
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Leadinfo
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is professional, business-oriented, and well-structured.
  3. Strong privacy and cookie consent mechanisms are implemented.
  4. WHOIS data is missing or domain appears unregistered, which is unusual.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage.
  6. Multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools are integrated.
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using WPBakery Page Builder and Yoast SEO Premium, ensuring good SEO and content management capabilities. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing technologies including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot, LinkedIn Insight Tag, and Cookiebot for consent management. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and uses FontAwesome for icons. Performance is moderate, with preconnect and preload hints for external resources. No hosting provider details were identified from the content. The technical setup supports a professional and scalable digital presence but could benefit from enhanced security header implementation and clearer hosting transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with transaction-network.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review transaction-network.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.