Skip to main content

Security report for trainersync.com

TrainerSync · Other · N/a

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

44/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

TrainerSync is a specialized SaaS provider offering personal trainer software designed for fitness professionals. Their platform enables client progress tracking, workout creation, booking scheduling, and online training delivery, positioning them as a niche player in the fitness technology market. The company has been established since 2011, indicating a mature presence in their domain. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including popular plugins for SEO, marketing, and user engagement. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile use, with good SEO practices evident. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and has domain transfer protections, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers, which are recommended for enhanced security. Privacy compliance is basic, with a cookie consent mechanism present but no visible privacy policy or terms of service. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy, though improvements in privacy and security documentation would strengthen its posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching trainersync.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
35
Average
44

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

TrainerSync operates in the fitness technology sector, targeting fitness professionals who require software to manage clients and deliver training services. Their business model is SaaS-based, focusing on subscription or license-based revenue streams. The company leverages social media presence, notably Facebook, to engage with its audience. The website content and structured data indicate a clear market positioning as a specialized tool for personal trainers. The absence of detailed contact information and privacy policies suggests room for growth in transparency and customer trust. The technology ecosystem includes integrations with marketing and analytics tools, supporting customer acquisition and retention strategies.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protections in place. However, the lack of DNSSEC and absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represent gaps that could expose the site to certain attack vectors. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of multiple third-party scripts introduces potential risk vectors that require ongoing monitoring. Privacy compliance is limited, with no explicit privacy policy or incident response contacts found, which could be a compliance risk under GDPR or similar regulations. Overall, the security posture is adequate but would benefit from enhanced documentation and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to enhance compliance and user trust.
  3. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Establish and publish incident response procedures and contact channels for security issues.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities and reduce tracking footprint.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
TrainerSync
Description
Powerful personal trainer software for fitness professionals. Track client progress, build workouts, schedule bookings and deliver online training.
Key services
Client progress tracking, Workout building, Booking scheduling, Online training delivery
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Google Fonts, Yoast SEO, WPBakery Page Builder, Heroic Knowledge Base plugin, SumoMe, Intercom, Facebook Pixel
Frameworks
WordPress CMS
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Security storage granted in consent settings

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Intercom, SumoMe
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses WordPress with common plugins for SEO and marketing.
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on homepage or linked resources.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented via Cookie Law Info plugin.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided HTML content.
  5. Social media presence includes Facebook page link.
  6. Use of multiple third-party marketing and tracking scripts.
  7. Domain is well aged and registered with a reputable registrar.
  8. No DNSSEC enabled, which is a recommended security improvement.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using PHP and jQuery, with additional plugins for SEO (Yoast), page building (WPBakery), knowledge base (Heroic Knowledge Base), and marketing (SumoMe, Intercom). The site loads Google Fonts and integrates Facebook Pixel for tracking. Performance is moderate with mobile optimization rated good. Accessibility features are basic, and SEO optimization is good with proper meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format. Hosting provider details are not explicit but domain registrar is known and reputable. The site could improve by enabling DNSSEC and adding security headers to reduce risk exposure. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small business SaaS website.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with trainersync.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review trainersync.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.