Skip to main content

Security report for trademark.io

Trademark.io · Other · United States

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Trademark.io is a professional online platform specializing in trademark registration, search, and brand protection services. The company leverages AI-powered tools and attorney-led legal support to provide comprehensive trademark solutions to startups, growing brands, and global businesses. It is positioned as a trusted service with over 4,500 trademark projects and strong integration with Atom.com for domain and naming services. The website is well-designed, mobile-optimized, and offers clear navigation and rich content relevant to its target audience. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript frameworks, Google Tag Manager, Intercom for customer engagement, and New Relic for performance monitoring, hosted behind Cloudflare DNS services. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protections, though some security headers and explicit policies could be improved. Privacy compliance is strong with clear privacy and cookie policies, though no explicit consent mechanism is observed. Overall, the site demonstrates high business credibility and professionalism.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching trademark.io

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
65
Email security
40
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention trademark.io, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for trademark.io right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Trademark.io operates in the legal services sector focusing on trademark and brand protection. Its business model combines online tools with expert legal services, targeting entrepreneurs, marketers, and legal teams. The company benefits from its partnership with Atom.com, expanding its offerings into domain marketplaces and naming contests. Revenue streams likely include trademark registration fees, premium reports, and brand monitoring subscriptions. The platform's AI integration and attorney network provide competitive advantages. Growth indicators include a large user base and extensive service portfolio. The partnership ecosystem with Atom.com enhances market reach and service diversity. Strategic observations suggest continued investment in AI and legal expertise to maintain market leadership.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and domain registration protections such as clientTransferProhibited status. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended enhancement. No explicit security policy or incident response information is publicly available, which could be a gap in transparency. The use of privacy protection for WHOIS is justified and common for this business type. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The site uses reputable third-party services for analytics and customer engagement, which are industry standard. Recommendations include adding security headers (CSP, HSTS), publishing a security policy, and establishing a vulnerability disclosure program to further strengthen security and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve domain security and prevent DNS spoofing.
  2. Implement and publish explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy and HSTS.
  3. Create and publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file for responsible reporting.
  5. Add a cookie consent mechanism to enhance GDPR compliance and user privacy transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Trademark.io
Description
Trademark.io offers trademark registration, search, and monitoring services with attorney-led filing, AI-powered research, and brand protection solutions.
Key services
Trademark Registration, Premium Trademark Reports, Brand Monitoring & Protection, Free Trademark Search, Domain Marketplace, Naming Services
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Intercom, New Relic Browser Agent, Cloudflare DNS
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited
  • Privacy service used for WHOIS

Analytics and tracking

Services
New Relic Browser, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
New Relic, Intercom
Marketing tools
Intercom
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking.
  2. Clear legal service focus with attorney involvement.
  3. Strong branding and consistent design.
  4. Multiple service offerings with clear navigation.
  5. Contact information is transparent and professional.
  6. No signs of phishing, malware, or suspicious activity.
  7. Use of modern analytics and marketing tools.
  8. No explicit security policy or incident response pages found.
  9. WHOIS privacy protection is used but justified.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based front end with asynchronous script loading and lazy loading techniques to optimize performance. It integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics and Intercom for customer support chat. New Relic Browser agent is used for performance monitoring. The site is hosted behind Cloudflare DNS, providing DNS-level resilience and performance benefits. The HTML and CSS are well-structured, with responsive design for mobile devices. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Performance is fast with good SEO meta tags and Open Graph data for social sharing. Accessibility is good with semantic HTML and ARIA roles. Technical risks are minimal but could be improved by adding security headers and DNSSEC. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable online legal service platform.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with trademark.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review trademark.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.