Skip to main content

Security report for tr-mi.de

Technology · N/a

High risk. 12 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 3 other checks.

Security score

41/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website at tr-mi.de is a login portal for a Matomo web analytics platform instance. It primarily serves as an access point for users to sign in and manage analytics data. The site is minimalistic, focusing on authentication without public-facing business content or marketing information. The platform is built using AngularJS and jQuery, leveraging Matomo's open-source analytics technology. The technical infrastructure is moderate, with HTTPS enforced and basic client-side scripting. However, the site lacks visible security headers and comprehensive privacy or cookie policies, which are critical for compliance and security best practices. No contact or business information is publicly available, limiting transparency and trust signals. The domain WHOIS data is minimal but consistent with German hosting providers, suggesting legitimacy but lacking detailed registrant information. Overall, the site functions as a secure login interface but requires enhancements in privacy compliance, security headers, and business transparency to improve its security posture and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

12 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: SMB

      Port 445 (SMB) is publicly accessible - SMB - Windows file sharing, high risk

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to SMB using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tr-mi.de

This scan found 30 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
45
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
25
Average
41

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The site operates as a service portal for Matomo analytics users, targeting website administrators and analysts who require detailed visitor tracking and reporting. The business model revolves around providing free/libre analytics software, likely supported by community contributions or professional services. Market positioning is niche within the web analytics sector, competing with other analytics platforms. The absence of public business details or contact information suggests a focus on existing users rather than customer acquisition. There are no visible partnerships or subsidiaries linked to this domain. Growth indicators and revenue streams cannot be assessed from the available data.

Security posture

Security measures include HTTPS enforcement and use of nonce tokens in login forms to prevent CSRF attacks. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces the overall security robustness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The site lacks visible incident response or security policy documentation, which could hinder rapid response to security events. Compliance with GDPR or other privacy regulations is not evident due to missing privacy and cookie policies. The security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with standard security best practices and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance and user transparency.
  2. Add essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and HSTS to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish contact information and security policy details to improve business credibility and incident response readiness.
  4. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments to identify and mitigate potential risks.
  5. Enhance user experience by improving mobile optimization and accessibility features.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
free/libre analytics platform
Key services
web analytics, visitor tracking, data reporting
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
AngularJS (ng-app), jQuery, Matomo analytics platform, JavaScript, CSS
Frameworks
AngularJS
Platforms
Matomo
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Login form uses POST method
  • CSRF nonce token present in login form

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a login page for Matomo analytics platform instance
  2. No public content or marketing pages detected
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the login page
  4. No contact information or business details publicly available
  5. Uses HTTPS with valid SSL
  6. No security headers detected in provided data
  7. No advertising or third-party marketing scripts detected
  8. No social media or external contact links present
  9. WHOIS data minimal but consistent with domain usage
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses AngularJS and jQuery within the Matomo analytics platform framework. The HTML structure is valid with embedded JavaScript for configuration and translations. The site is served over HTTPS, indicating a secure transport layer. Performance appears moderate with no heavy external dependencies detected. Mobile optimization is basic, with some responsive design elements but no advanced accessibility features. SEO optimization is minimal due to lack of meta descriptions beyond the default and no open graph or structured data markup. The hosting environment is likely German-based, inferred from DNS servers. There is no CMS detected beyond the Matomo platform itself. Technical risks include missing security headers and potential outdated JavaScript libraries if not regularly updated.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tr-mi.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tr-mi.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.