Skip to main content

Security report for tpcr-turnov.cz

Other · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.tpcr-turnov.cz serves as an informational portal focused on promoting local landmarks and tourism in Turnov, Czech Republic. It provides links to partner sites such as the Valdštejn Castle, Synagogue Turnov, and the local information center. The site uses the Public4u CMS platform and relies on traditional web technologies like jQuery and CSS. The content is primarily in Czech with language options for English, German, and Polish, targeting a general audience interested in cultural and historical tourism. The site lacks detailed business information and contact data, which limits its business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tpcr-turnov.cz

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
40
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions itself as a local tourism promotion platform, likely operated by a small organization or local authority. Its business model appears informational and promotional without direct commercial transactions. The presence of partner domains indicates a cooperative ecosystem focused on regional tourism. However, the absence of detailed company data, certifications, or contact information suggests limited transparency and possibly a low scale of operations. The site’s content and navigation are basic, indicating modest investment in digital maturity.

Security posture

Security posture is minimal with no visible security headers or advanced protections in place. The site uses HTTP headers to prevent caching but lacks evidence of HTTPS enforcement in the provided data. No security or incident response policies are published, and no vulnerability disclosure or data protection officer information is available. The absence of WHOIS data further reduces trust. The site does implement a cookie consent mechanism, indicating some awareness of privacy compliance. Overall, the security maturity is low, exposing the site to potential risks.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce secure connections site-wide.
  2. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve security posture.
  3. Publish a clear privacy policy and terms of service to enhance compliance and user trust.
  4. Provide explicit contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility.
  5. Conduct a security audit to identify and remediate any vulnerable scripts or outdated libraries.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Phasellus rhoncus. Aliquam erat volutpat. Etiam bibendum elit eget erat. Nulla turpis magna, cursus sit amet, suscipit a, interdum id, felis. Nulla
Key services
Tourism information, Promotion of local landmarks
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery, jQuery UI, JavaScript, CSS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, which is unusual and reduces trust.
  3. Content is primarily informational about local landmarks and tourism in Turnov, Czech Republic.
  4. No explicit privacy policy page found, but cookie policy and consent mechanism are implemented.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on the main page.
  6. Website uses an older CMS (Public4u) and relies on jQuery and related scripts.
  7. No security headers or advanced security measures detected in the HTML content.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in the provided HTML.
  9. Navigation and content structure are basic but functional.
  10. No social media links or business certifications found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Public4u CMS platform and uses jQuery and related JavaScript libraries for UI interactions. The HTML structure is basic with CSS for styling and some JavaScript for galleries and popups. Performance is moderate with no advanced optimization detected. Mobile optimization is basic, and accessibility features are minimal. SEO is supported by meta tags but lacks advanced structured data such as JSON-LD or Open Graph tags. The site does not appear to use modern frameworks or analytics tools, indicating technical debt and opportunities for modernization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tpcr-turnov.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tpcr-turnov.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.