Skip to main content

Security report for tovr.cz

Other · Czech Republic

High risk. 12 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

42/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website tovr.cz currently serves a 403 Forbidden error page, indicating that access to its content is blocked or restricted. The page contains no business information, contact details, or privacy and cookie policies, limiting the ability to assess the company's operations or compliance posture. The domain is registered since 2011 with a Czech registrar, consistent with the domain's country code and suggesting legitimacy. However, the lack of accessible content and policies significantly impairs a full security and compliance evaluation. Technically, the site uses basic HTML and CSS with Google Fonts but lacks modern frameworks or analytics. Security headers and HTTPS configuration could not be verified due to the access restriction. Overall, the site shows poor content quality and minimal technical sophistication, with a low trustworthiness rating due to the blocked status and missing compliance indicators.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

12 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: PostgreSQL

      Port 5432 (PostgreSQL) is publicly accessible - PostgreSQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to PostgreSQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tovr.cz

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
42

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the 403 Forbidden error blocking access, no business intelligence data such as company name, services, market position, or target audience could be extracted. The domain age and registrar information suggest a stable registration history, but no further business insights are available from the current content. There are no visible partnerships, certifications, or trust signals. The absence of contact information and policies limits the assessment of business credibility and operational transparency.

Security posture

The website's security posture is weak as evidenced by the 403 Forbidden error page, which may indicate misconfigured access controls or intentional blocking. No security headers or HTTPS enforcement details were found in the provided content. There are no visible security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. The lack of privacy and cookie policies also points to compliance gaps. The domain registration is consistent and legitimate, but the website itself lacks security best practices and transparency, resulting in a low security score.

Recommendations

  1. Resolve the 403 Forbidden error to allow legitimate user access and enable content analysis.
  2. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  3. Add clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer and security incident reporting.
  4. Configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  5. Ensure HTTPS is properly configured and enforced site-wide to protect user data and improve trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

None detected. Website returns a 403 Forbidden error page indicating access is blocked or restricted. No evidence of common WAF providers like Cloudflare or Sucuri detected. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, Google Fonts
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
20/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is inaccessible due to 403 Forbidden error.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact information or forms available on the page.
  4. No scripts or analytics detected in the HTML content.
  5. Minimal SEO and accessibility features present.
  6. No social media or external business links found.
  7. WHOIS data indicates a legitimate domain with no privacy protection.
  8. No evidence of WAF or security challenge pages like Cloudflare.
  9. Website appears to be down or access restricted, limiting analysis.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses basic HTML5 and CSS3 with Google Fonts for typography. There is no evidence of CMS, JavaScript frameworks, analytics, or marketing tools. The hosting provider is REG-ZONER, a Czech registrar and hosting service. The site appears to have moderate performance potential but lacks mobile optimization and accessibility features. The 403 error page is styled but provides no functional navigation or content. Technical debt is likely high due to minimal implementation and lack of modern web practices. Modernization opportunities include adding responsive design, SEO meta tags, analytics, and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 49/100High31 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tovr.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tovr.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.