Skip to main content

Security report for toulouse-tech-transfer.com

Other · France

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website at toulouse-tech-transfer.com/owa/auth/logon.aspx is a Microsoft Outlook Web Access (OWA) login portal hosted on a custom domain registered with OVH sas since 2011. The site primarily serves as an authentication gateway for email access and does not provide business descriptive content, privacy policies, or contact information on the login page. The domain registration is consistent and legitimate, hosted by a reputable provider, but the website content is minimal and focused solely on login functionality. Technically, the site uses standard Microsoft OWA web technologies including JavaScript, HTML5, and CSS, with some legacy ActiveX references for S/MIME controls. The hosting provider is OVH sas, and the domain is not DNSSEC enabled. The site lacks modern security headers and privacy compliance disclosures, which limits its security posture and GDPR compliance. Mobile optimization and SEO are basic, and no analytics or advertising scripts are detected. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS (implied by URL), employs POST method for login form submission with autocomplete disabled, and includes client-side scripts for password visibility toggling. However, the absence of security headers and privacy policies reduces the overall security maturity. No vulnerabilities or malware indicators are detected in the provided data. Overall, the website functions as a secure login portal but lacks comprehensive privacy, security, and business transparency features. Strategic improvements in security headers, privacy compliance, and user experience would enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching toulouse-tech-transfer.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The domain is registered to OVH sas, a known hosting provider, indicating the site is likely hosted on a third-party infrastructure rather than directly by the business. The website does not provide explicit business information, contact details, or marketing content, limiting insights into market positioning or revenue streams. The site appears to serve internal or partner users requiring Outlook Web Access. There is no evidence of partnerships, subsidiaries, or affiliate programs linked from the site. The business model is likely service-oriented, providing email access to a defined user base. Growth indicators and strategic partnerships cannot be assessed due to lack of public information.

Security posture

The security posture is moderate. The site uses HTTPS and secure form submission practices but lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security. DNSSEC is not enabled on the domain, which could improve DNS security. No privacy or cookie policies are present, which is a compliance gap under GDPR. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are absent. The site does not expose sensitive data in the HTML content. Overall, the site is functional and secure for login purposes but would benefit from enhanced security controls and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security.
  2. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  4. Add vulnerability disclosure and incident response contact information to improve security transparency.
  5. Enhance mobile optimization and accessibility to improve user experience across devices.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Microsoft Outlook Web Access, JavaScript, ActiveX (conditional), HTML5, CSS
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL)
  • Form uses POST method with autocomplete off
  • Client-side input handling for password visibility

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a Microsoft Outlook Web Access login page hosted on a custom domain.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are present on the login page.
  3. No contact information or business details are provided on the page.
  4. No external analytics or advertising scripts detected.
  5. Domain is registered with OVH sas and is not privacy protected.
  6. No security headers detected in the provided data; security posture could be improved.
  7. Mobile optimization and SEO are minimal.
  8. Content is minimal and focused solely on authentication.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Microsoft Outlook Web Access technology, using standard HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. The presence of legacy ActiveX references indicates some backward compatibility considerations. The hosting provider is OVH sas, a reputable European hosting company. Performance is moderate with no explicit indicators of slow loading but also no advanced optimization. SEO is minimal with no meta description or Open Graph tags. Accessibility features are basic, with some ARIA labels present. The site lacks modern CMS or frameworks and appears to be a static login portal. Technical risks include missing security headers and lack of DNSSEC, which could be addressed to improve security and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with toulouse-tech-transfer.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review toulouse-tech-transfer.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.