Skip to main content

Security report for toucharcade.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website toucharcade.com is currently inaccessible due to a Cloudflare Web Application Firewall (WAF) security challenge page that requires human verification via Turnstile captcha. This prevents access to the actual website content, limiting the ability to analyze business, security, and compliance details. The domain is registered since 2007 with NameCheap, Inc., indicating a mature and likely legitimate website. The use of Cloudflare services suggests a focus on security and performance. However, no privacy policies, contact information, or business details are visible in the provided content. The security posture is partially observable through the presence of Cloudflare protection but lacks visible security headers or policies in the HTML. Overall, the site is protected by modern security mechanisms but cannot be fully assessed due to access restrictions.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching toucharcade.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
50
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the WAF challenge, no direct business intelligence data such as company name, services, or market positioning could be extracted. The domain age and registrar information suggest a stable presence. The lack of visible contact or policy information limits insights into operational transparency or compliance. The website likely targets a general audience interested in its niche, but specifics are unavailable.

Security posture

The website employs Cloudflare's security services including Turnstile captcha, indicating a proactive approach to mitigating automated threats and DDoS attacks. However, no explicit security headers or policies are visible in the HTML content. The absence of visible forms or data collection reduces immediate attack surface but also limits assessment of input validation or secure data handling. The domain registration is consistent and not privacy protected, which supports legitimacy. Overall, the security posture is moderate but cannot be fully evaluated due to content blocking.

Recommendations

  1. Provide publicly accessible privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance transparency.
  2. Ensure security headers (e.g., Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options) are properly configured and visible.
  3. Publish clear contact information and incident response channels to enhance trust and support.
  4. Consider providing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Review WAF challenge settings to balance security with accessibility for legitimate users.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Cloudflare detected. Page is a Cloudflare security challenge page with Turnstile captcha verifying human access. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Technology

Stack
Cloudflare Turnstile, Cloudflare WAF, JavaScript

Analytics and tracking

Site quality

Key observations

  1. Website content is blocked by Cloudflare WAF challenge page.
  2. No visible business or contact information on the landing page.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies detected in the provided HTML.
  4. No forms or data collection elements detected on the challenge page.
  5. External links only to Cloudflare domains for security and challenge scripts.
  6. No social media or email addresses found in the provided content.
  7. No security headers visible in the HTML content provided.
  8. Domain WHOIS data indicates a long-established domain with no privacy protection.
  9. Website likely uses Cloudflare for DDoS protection and bot mitigation.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Cloudflare as a hosting and security provider, leveraging their WAF and Turnstile captcha for bot mitigation. The HTML content is minimal and serves only as a challenge page, lacking business content or metadata. No CMS or frameworks are detectable from the provided content. Performance and SEO cannot be assessed due to content blocking. The technical stack is modern in terms of security but limited in visible implementation details. Opportunities exist to improve metadata, accessibility, and public-facing compliance documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with toucharcade.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review toucharcade.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.