Skip to main content

Security report for tototheo.com

Tototheo Global · Telecommunications · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Tototheo Global is a well-established company specializing in global connectivity and technology solutions, particularly focused on the maritime sector with over 40 years of expertise. Their website reflects a professional presence with a clear emphasis on innovation, security, and sustainability in maritime communications. The company positions itself as a leader in bridging the digital divide and fostering a connected future. Technically, the website employs modern frontend frameworks such as Bootstrap and AOS, integrates marketing and analytics tools like HubSpot and Google Tag Manager, and uses Cloudflare for DNS and likely CDN services. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. Security-wise, HTTPS is enforced and cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, but there is a lack of published privacy policies, terms of service, and security headers, which are areas for improvement. The domain WHOIS data is consistent with the business claims, showing a mature domain age and no privacy protection, supporting the legitimacy of the site. Overall, the website is functional and professional but could enhance trust and compliance by adding explicit privacy and security policies.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tototheo.com

This scan found 20 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
100
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Tototheo Global operates in the telecommunications sector with a focus on maritime connectivity solutions. Their business model is B2B, targeting maritime industry professionals and enterprises requiring advanced connectivity and technology services. The company leverages over four decades of experience to maintain a strong market position as an innovator in secure and sustainable maritime communications. Their partnership ecosystem includes major technology and marketing platforms, though no explicit partner or subsidiary domains were identified. The company appears to have a medium-sized operation with a consistent brand presence and a focus on digital transformation in maritime operations.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and a cookie consent mechanism in place. However, the absence of key security headers (such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) and lack of published security policies or incident response contacts indicate gaps in security best practices. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Compliance with GDPR is partially indicated by the cookie consent but lacks a formal privacy policy. Incident response readiness and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not evident, which could impact the company's ability to respond to security incidents effectively.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add a terms of service page to clarify user and business obligations.
  3. Implement and publish a security policy including incident response contacts.
  4. Enhance HTTP security headers to protect against common web vulnerabilities.
  5. Enable DNSSEC to improve domain name system security and integrity.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Tototheo Global
Description
Tototheo Global is a leader in connectivity and technology with over 40 years of maritime expertise. They focus on driving progress, security, and sustainability through innovative solutions for efficient operations, aiming to bridge the digital divide and foster a connected, sustainable future.
Key services
Maritime connectivity solutions, Technology innovation for efficient operations, Security and sustainability solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, AOS (Animate On Scroll), Owl Carousel, FontAwesome, Cookiebot, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), HubSpot Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Google Analytics (via GTM), HubSpot tracking
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Cookiebot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no WAF blocking
  2. Cookie consent implemented via Cookiebot
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content provided
  5. Use of modern frontend libraries and marketing tools
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page detected
  7. No visible security headers detected in provided data
  8. Domain WHOIS data consistent with business claims and mature domain age
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and popular frontend technology stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, AOS for animations, Owl Carousel for sliders, and FontAwesome for icons. Marketing and analytics are integrated via HubSpot, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook Pixel, indicating a mature digital marketing approach. Hosting and DNS are managed through Cloudflare, providing performance and security benefits. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly with proper meta tags and canonical URLs. However, accessibility features are basic and could be improved. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by the number of external scripts and tracking services. There is no detected CMS, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Technical risks include missing security headers and lack of formal privacy and security documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tototheo.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tototheo.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.