Skip to main content

Security report for totalizators.com

Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Totalizators.com is a Latvian language website specializing in expert reviews and comparisons of licensed sports totalizators (bookmakers) in Latvia for the year 2025. The site positions itself as a leading platform for Latvian sports betting customers seeking reliable information and the best offers from licensed operators. The business model appears to be affiliate-based, providing curated content and bonus offers to users. The website is well-branded and consistent, targeting an adult audience interested in legal sports betting within Latvia. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including Cloudflare DNS, AWS Cloudfront CDN, Google Fonts, and likely WordPress CMS. The site is mobile optimized with good SEO practices and a professional design. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection, but lacks DNSSEC and explicit security headers. Privacy compliance is limited due to absence of a clear privacy policy and terms of service, though a cookie consent mechanism is present. No direct contact or incident response information is provided, which may impact user trust and compliance. Overall, the site is functional and professional but could improve transparency and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching totalizators.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
95
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website targets the Latvian sports betting market, focusing on licensed totalizators, which is a regulated sector. Its competitive advantage lies in expert reviews and comparison of licensed operators, helping users make informed choices. Revenue likely derives from affiliate commissions and advertising. The site’s content and branding are consistent and tailored to Latvian users, indicating a focused market approach. The domain age of over 12 years supports credibility and market presence. However, lack of explicit company information, contact details, and certifications limits full business transparency. The partnership ecosystem is not evident from the data, and no related or subsidiary domains were identified. Growth indicators such as updated content and SEO optimization suggest ongoing maintenance and relevance.

Security posture

The website benefits from HTTPS encryption and domain transfer protection, which are positive security indicators. However, the absence of DNSSEC reduces DNS security robustness. No security headers (such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, or HSTS) were detected, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file is present, limiting transparency and incident response readiness. The site does not expose sensitive data in the HTML content, and no vulnerable libraries were identified in the provided data. Forms are present but no detailed analysis of their security was possible due to content truncation. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers, DNSSEC, and incident response policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and configure essential security headers such as CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security incident contacts and consider publishing a security.txt file.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to avoid vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Labākie sporta totalizatori 2025 → Izvērtē ekspertu apskatus un salīdzini labākos piedāvājumus no Latvijā licencētajiem totalizatoriem
Key services
Expert reviews, Comparison of licensed Latvian sports totalizators, Bonus offers
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Cloudflare DNS, Google Fonts, Amazon Cloudfront CDN
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • clientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a Latvian language sports betting comparison and review platform
  2. Content is well structured with good SEO metadata and Open Graph tags
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found in the provided HTML
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found
  7. Uses Cloudflare DNS and AWS Cloudfront CDN for hosting and delivery
  8. No obvious security headers detected in the provided data
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected
  10. Website targets adult audience interested in licensed Latvian sports betting
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack with Cloudflare DNS, AWS Cloudfront CDN for content delivery, and Google Fonts for typography. The presence of WordPress-specific CSS and classes suggests WordPress CMS usage. The site is mobile optimized and uses responsive design techniques. Performance is moderate, likely benefiting from CDN usage but could be improved with further optimization. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags, Open Graph, and Twitter card metadata. Accessibility is basic but present. No major technical debt or outdated technologies were detected in the provided content. The site lacks advanced frameworks or SPA technologies, indicating a traditional multi-page architecture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with totalizators.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review totalizators.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.