Skip to main content

Security report for totalcontrolracing.com

totalcontrolracing.com · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website totalcontrolracing.com appears to be a minimal WordPress-based site with very limited content and no clear business description or services offered. The site uses common technologies such as WordPress CMS, jQuery, Font Awesome, and the Yoast SEO plugin, hosted likely on Hostinger infrastructure. The site lacks essential business and legal information such as privacy policies, cookie consent, terms of service, and contact details beyond a personal Gmail address exposed in a blog post. Security posture is weak with no DNSSEC, no security headers, and exposed personal email increasing risk. The domain WHOIS data is inconsistent, showing a creation date in the future and no registrant details, which raises legitimacy concerns. Overall, the site is low quality, with poor content and minimal technical sophistication, resulting in a low trust and security score.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching totalcontrolracing.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
37
Security headers
30
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention totalcontrolracing.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for totalcontrolracing.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

There is insufficient business intelligence to determine market positioning, competitive advantages, or revenue streams. The site does not present a clear business model or target audience. External links to unrelated domains suggest possible spam or advertising intent rather than a legitimate business presence. The lack of certifications, contact information, and policies further undermines credibility. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified.

Security posture

The security maturity level is low. The site uses HTTPS but lacks DNSSEC and security headers, exposing it to common web attacks. The exposed personal email address in content is a privacy risk. No incident response or security policies are published. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. The site does not demonstrate GDPR compliance or data protection officer presence. Overall, the security posture is insufficient for a trustworthy business website.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC and implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, etc.) to improve security posture.
  2. Remove exposed personal email addresses from public content and provide official company contact emails.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance statements.
  4. Correct WHOIS domain registration data to reflect accurate creation date and registrant information.
  5. Improve website content quality, navigation, and professional presentation to enhance trustworthiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
totalcontrolracing.com
Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Font Awesome, Yoast SEO, Hostinger Reach Subscription Plugin
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Hostinger Reach Subscription Plugin
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is a minimal WordPress blog with almost no meaningful content.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. Contact information is limited to a personal Gmail address exposed in blog post metadata.
  4. No security policies or incident response information available.
  5. No certifications or trust signals present.
  6. External links to suspicious domains related to 'hela-lanka' ads with no clear business relation.
  7. Technical stack is basic with standard WordPress plugins and themes.
  8. No advanced security headers or DNSSEC configured.
  9. SEO optimization is minimal but Yoast SEO plugin is installed.
  10. No analytics or tracking services detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 7.0 with standard plugins such as Yoast SEO and Hostinger Reach Subscription. It uses jQuery 3.7.1 and Font Awesome for UI elements. The site loads CSS and JS assets from its own domain. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization detected. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic but present. SEO metadata is minimal but includes canonical tags and Open Graph data. No advanced frameworks or platforms detected. Hosting provider inferred as Hostinger from plugin naming. Technical debt is low but modernization and security improvements are needed.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with totalcontrolracing.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review totalcontrolracing.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.