Skip to main content

Security report for torggler.com

Torggler · Manufacturing · Italy

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Torggler is a well-established manufacturing company specializing in technical materials for construction, window frames, and nautical sectors, boasting a history of over 160 years. The company offers a broad range of products including sealants, adhesives, polyurethane foams, waterproofing solutions, flooring, concrete restoration, and insulation materials. Their website is professionally designed, multilingual, and optimized for SEO, targeting professionals and businesses in relevant industries. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with WooCommerce and uses modern libraries such as jQuery and Owl Carousel, with analytics provided by Plausible. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enabled, but lacks some security headers and explicit security policies on the site. WHOIS data for the domain is missing or unavailable, which raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy and reduces trustworthiness. Overall, the website is functional, professional, and content-rich but would benefit from improved transparency on privacy and security policies.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching torggler.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention torggler.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for torggler.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a global leader in manufacturing technical materials for multiple sectors, leveraging a long history and diversified product portfolio. Their business model focuses on product manufacturing and sales, supported by digital resources such as an academy, downloads, and videos. The multilingual website supports international reach. The absence of explicit contact emails or phone numbers in the HTML suggests reliance on contact forms for communication. The company demonstrates strong branding consistency and trust signals such as product certifications and a professional web presence. Growth indicators include continuous product innovation and a broad sector focus. No clear parent or subsidiary companies were identified from the data.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications. However, no explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could improve protection against common web attacks. The site uses standard WordPress and WooCommerce plugins, which require regular updates to mitigate vulnerabilities. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were found in the HTML. The cookie consent mechanism is implemented, indicating some privacy compliance. Incident response and security policy information are not present on the site, which could hinder rapid response to security incidents. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced with additional headers and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance web security.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages clearly accessible from the website footer or main navigation.
  3. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure domain legitimacy and improve trustworthiness.
  4. Add explicit security and incident response policies and contact channels to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain security.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Torggler
Description
Torggler is a global reference in the production of technical materials for construction, window frames, and nautical sectors, with over 160 years of history. They offer products such as sealants, adhesives, polyurethane foams, waterproofing, flooring, tile and natural stone installation, concrete restoration, structural consolidation, thermal insulation, coatings, additives, and tools.
Key services
Sealants and adhesives, Polyurethane foams, Waterproofing, Flooring systems, Concrete restoration, Structural consolidation, Thermal insulation, Coatings and paints, Additives, Tools
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, jQuery, Owl Carousel, Yoast SEO, Google Fonts, Plausible Analytics
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (implied by WordPress ecosystem)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Plausible Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Plausible Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multiple language support.
  2. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided HTML; contact form present.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in the HTML snippet.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented via a plugin.
  5. Website uses modern web technologies and SEO best practices.
  6. No security headers detected in HTML source; SSL is enabled.
  7. WHOIS data is missing or domain not found in the queried WHOIS server, raising concerns about domain registration status.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform with WooCommerce for e-commerce capabilities. It uses jQuery and Owl Carousel for interactive UI components and employs Yoast SEO for search engine optimization. Fonts are loaded from Google Fonts and local sources. The site is mobile responsive and optimized for accessibility and SEO. Analytics are handled by Plausible, a privacy-focused analytics service. Performance is moderate, with preloading of fonts and images. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected. Hosting provider details are not disclosed in the HTML. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and user-friendly experience but could benefit from enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with torggler.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review torggler.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.