Skip to main content

Security report for topogeo.es

Other · Spain

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Topogeo.es is a small professional service provider specializing in topography, civil engineering, building, and surveying services in Spain. The company leverages over 20 years of sector experience and offers solutions including drone-based surveying and design services. The website is built using Mobirise with Bootstrap and common JavaScript libraries, providing a basic but functional online presence. However, the site lacks comprehensive privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, and does not provide explicit contact information, which limits user trust and compliance. Security posture is minimal with no detected security headers and unknown SSL configuration. The WHOIS data is inaccessible due to registry restrictions typical for .es domains, which limits domain registration transparency but is not unusual. Overall, the website serves as a basic informational platform for a niche engineering service provider but requires improvements in security, privacy, and contact transparency to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching topogeo.es

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets businesses in civil engineering, construction, and surveying sectors, offering specialized services including drone operations and topographic design. The business model is service-oriented, focusing on professional quality and tailored solutions. Market positioning appears to be that of a small, experienced local player with no visible partnerships or subsidiaries. The website's limited content and lack of detailed business information suggest a modest digital maturity level. No analytics or marketing tools are employed, indicating a low level of digital marketing sophistication. The presence of social media links suggests some engagement efforts but these are not prominently displayed.

Security posture

The security maturity of the website is low. There is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or security headers in the provided data, and no privacy or cookie policies are present to indicate GDPR compliance. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The absence of contact emails and phone numbers further reduces transparency. The website does not appear to use any analytics or tracking services, which limits data exposure but also reduces insights into user behavior. Overall, the security posture is minimal and improvements are needed to meet basic security and privacy standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and enforce secure connections site-wide.
  2. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  4. Provide explicit contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve trust and communication.
  5. Consider adding an incident response or security contact channel to enhance transparency and readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Empresa formada por profesionales con más de 20 años de experiencia en topografía, con conocimientos y soporte en ingeniería civil, edificación y agrimensura. Ofrece soluciones adaptadas para optimizar rendimientos con servicios profesionales y de calidad.
Key services
Topografía, Ingeniería Civil, Edificación, Agrimensura, Servicios con drones (RPAS/UAVs), Diseño Topográfico
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Mobirise Website Builder v5.9.18, Bootstrap 4, jQuery, Tether, Animate.css, Jarallax, Smooth Scroll
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable due to registry access restrictions.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the website.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on the site.
  5. Social media links to Facebook, YouTube, and LinkedIn are present but hidden by default.
  6. Website built with Mobirise, using Bootstrap and common JS libraries.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  8. No security headers detected in provided data; SSL status unknown.
  9. Content is minimal and basic but relevant to the business domain.
  10. No forms detected on the homepage HTML provided.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Mobirise Website Builder with Bootstrap 4 and common JavaScript libraries like jQuery and Animate.css. The site is mobile responsive and uses Google Fonts for typography. Performance is moderate with no advanced optimization detected. No CMS beyond Mobirise is used. No analytics or tracking scripts are present, indicating minimal data collection. The site lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features beyond basic responsiveness. No hosting provider information is discernible from the HTML content. Overall, the technical implementation is basic but functional for a small business informational site.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with topogeo.es. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review topogeo.es.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.