Skip to main content

Security report for topex.ro

Rohde & Schwarz Topex SA · Telecommunications · Romania

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.

Security score

83/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Rohde & Schwarz Topex S.A., established in 1990 and part of the Rohde & Schwarz group since 2010, specializes in mission critical and enterprise communication solutions focusing on IP technologies. The company targets government agencies, public safety organizations, and enterprises requiring secure and resilient voice and data communication systems. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence with clear information about their services and career opportunities. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and SEO tools, offering good performance and mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and GDPR compliance evident through cookie consent mechanisms and privacy policies. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. WHOIS data is privacy protected under ROTLD, which is typical for Romanian domains, and does not raise immediate concerns. Overall, the website and business demonstrate a mature digital presence with good security and compliance practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching topex.ro

This scan found 17 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
80
Email security
80
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
83

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a strong niche position within the telecommunications sector, focusing on mission critical solutions such as air traffic control, maritime communications, emergency services, and enterprise voice/data routers. Their B2B business model serves government and enterprise clients, leveraging the reputation and resources of the Rohde & Schwarz parent company. The website indicates active engagement with potential employees and customers, supported by social media channels and comprehensive policy disclosures. The absence of visible certifications or security policies suggests areas for future enhancement. The company appears stable with a medium size footprint and a clear focus on innovation and customer relationships.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses secure contact forms, with no visible exposure of sensitive information. GDPR compliance is well implemented with cookie consent and privacy policies. However, security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not explicitly detected and could be improved. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure pages were found, indicating potential gaps in transparency and readiness. The use of up-to-date WordPress and plugins is assumed but should be regularly verified. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from enhanced header policies and formal incident response documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Add an incident response policy page and security contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Establish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Rohde & Schwarz Topex SA
Description
Established in 1990, Rohde & Schwarz Topex S.A. is part of the Rohde & Schwarz group since 2010, serving as a Center of Competence for voice switching solutions with a focus on IP technologies and safety.
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, PHP, Yoast SEO plugin, WPBakery Page Builder, Slider Revolution, jQuery 3.7.1, Ultimate VC Addons, Contact Form 7, GDPR Cookie Compliance plugin
Frameworks
WordPress CMS
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of GDPR cookie compliance plugin
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure contact forms (Contact Form 7)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO, GDPR Cookie Compliance
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich
  2. No WAF or blocking detected, full content accessible
  3. WHOIS data is privacy protected with no registrar or dates disclosed
  4. Strong presence of privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance
  5. Contact information is clearly provided with company domain email and phone
  6. Use of modern WordPress plugins and SEO tools
  7. No visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data
  8. Social media presence on major platforms
  9. No explicit security or incident response policy pages found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 using popular plugins such as Yoast SEO, WPBakery Page Builder, Slider Revolution, and Contact Form 7. The tech stack is modern and supports responsive design with good SEO optimization. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in loading speed and accessibility. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site uses Google Fonts and Google Analytics for tracking. GDPR compliance is managed via a dedicated cookie compliance plugin. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from performance tuning and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with topex.ro. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review topex.ro.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.