Skip to main content

Security report for topcleaning.lv

Top Cleaning · Other · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Top Cleaning is a Latvian cleaning service provider offering a wide range of cleaning and maintenance services across multiple cities including Daugavpils and Riga. Their website presents a professional image with detailed service descriptions and a clear contact phone number. The company targets both residential and commercial customers, positioning itself as a regional service provider with a focus on quality and customer satisfaction. Technically, the website uses modern JavaScript libraries and integrates popular analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google Optimize, and Facebook Pixel. The site is mobile optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. Security posture is moderate; while HTTPS is presumably enabled, no explicit security headers were detected and no privacy or security policies are published. Cookie consent is implemented, indicating some level of privacy compliance. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits limits domain registration insights, but the website content and structure suggest a legitimate small business. Overall, the site is safe, professional, and functional but could improve in security and privacy transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching topcleaning.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Top Cleaning operates in the cleaning and facility maintenance sector, serving a broad geographic area within Latvia. Their business model is service-oriented, focusing on various cleaning niches such as general cleaning, post-renovation cleaning, soft furniture cleaning, window washing, floor waxing, disinfection, facade cleaning, and territory maintenance. The company leverages digital marketing tools and tracking pixels to optimize customer engagement and marketing effectiveness. The lack of detailed company registration or certification information on the site suggests a small to medium-sized enterprise with a local market focus. The website's multilingual support (Latvian and Russian) indicates an inclusive approach to the regional demographic. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the data provided.

Security posture

The website demonstrates basic security hygiene with HTTPS usage and cookie consent mechanisms. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, or HSTS reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are provided, which limits transparency in security management. The use of third-party analytics and marketing scripts introduces moderate user tracking, which is partially mitigated by the cookie consent banner. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing security headers, publishing privacy and security policies, and providing incident response information.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve transparency and GDPR compliance.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information to build trust and readiness.
  4. Ensure SSL/TLS configuration is strong and regularly audited to maintain secure communications.
  5. Consider adding verified company contact emails and physical address information to improve business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Top Cleaning
Description
Uzņēmums Top Cleaning piedāvā plašu uzkopšanas pakalpojumu klāstu Daugavpilī, Rīgā un visā Latvijā. Mūsu daudzgadīgā pieredze un darbinieku augstā kvalifikācija garantē nevainojamu tīrību un kvalitatīvi padarīto darbu.
Key services
Telpu uzkopšanas serviss, Ģenerālā uzkopšana, Uzkopšana pēc remontdarbiem, Mīksto mēbeļu tīrīšana, Logu mazgāšana, Grīdas seguma vaskošana, Telpu dezinfekcija, Ēku fasādes uzkopšana, Teritorijas uzkopšana
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Slick Carousel, Remodal, Fancybox, Air Datepicker, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Google Optimize
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Optimize, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Google Optimize, Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on homepage or linked pages.
  4. Cookie consent banner present and functional.
  5. Contact phone number clearly displayed with Latvian country code.
  6. Multiple cleaning services detailed with images and descriptions.
  7. Use of common web analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel.
  8. No email addresses or physical addresses explicitly found in the HTML content.
  9. No security headers detected in the HTML content; SSL status unknown.
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information present.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end technology stack including jQuery, Slick Carousel, Remodal, Fancybox, and Air Datepicker for UI components and interactivity. It integrates Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google Optimize, and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing optimization. The site is mobile responsive and has good SEO metadata including Open Graph tags. No CMS or hosting provider information is explicitly detected. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. Accessibility features are basic but present. There is room for improvement in security headers and privacy-related technical implementations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with topcleaning.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review topcleaning.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.