Skip to main content

Security report for toolbox-opferschutz.at

Gesundheit Österreich GmbH · Government · Austria

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website toolbox-opferschutz.at is operated by Gesundheit Österreich GmbH, a government-affiliated organization in Austria focused on health promotion and victim protection. It serves as a comprehensive resource for healthcare professionals, victim protection groups, and affected individuals, providing educational materials, legal information, and networking opportunities. The site is well-positioned as a national competence center in Austria for these topics. Technically, the website is built on Drupal 10, employs Matomo analytics for privacy-respecting user tracking, and is optimized for mobile devices with good accessibility and SEO practices. The performance is moderate, and the site uses HTTPS with a valid SSL configuration, ensuring secure communications. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates good practices such as HTTPS enforcement and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, it lacks explicit security headers and a cookie consent mechanism, which are recommended for enhanced security and GDPR compliance. No vulnerabilities or suspicious activities were detected. Overall, the website is trustworthy, professionally maintained, and serves an important public health and social function. Strategic improvements in security headers and privacy consent would further strengthen its security posture and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
33/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching toolbox-opferschutz.at

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
33
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Toolbox-Opferschutz operates within the Austrian government and non-profit healthcare sector, focusing on victim protection and health promotion. Its market position is strong as a national competence center, supported by the Gesundheit Österreich GmbH and the Austrian Federal Ministry of Social Affairs, Health, Care and Consumer Protection. The business model is non-commercial, funded by government resources, targeting healthcare professionals, victim support groups, and affected individuals. The website supports growth through educational offerings, networking, and resource dissemination. Partnerships with governmental bodies and health organizations enhance its credibility and reach.

Security posture

The website maintains a good security posture with HTTPS and privacy-conscious analytics via Matomo. There are no signs of exposed sensitive data or vulnerabilities in the HTML content. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces its defense-in-depth. The lack of a cookie consent banner is a compliance gap under GDPR. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies are not publicly available, which could be improved to enhance transparency and readiness. Overall, the site is secure but could benefit from implementing additional security best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and inform users about tracking.
  2. Add security headers including Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and CMS to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Gesundheit Österreich GmbH
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Gesundheit Österreich GmbH
Description
Der Fonds Gesundes Österreich (FGÖ) - ein Geschäftsbereich der Gesundheit Österreich GmbH - ist die nationale Kompetenzstelle für Gesundheitsförderung und Primärprävention. Die Website bietet umfangreiche Informationen und Ressourcen zum Thema Opferschutz, insbesondere im Gesundheitswesen in Österreich.
Key services
Informationsbereitstellung zu Opferschutz, Schulungsangebote, Bereitstellung von Materialien und Checklisten, Vernetzung von Opferschutzgruppen, Veranstaltungen und Fortbildungen
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 10, Matomo Analytics, jQuery (implied by Drupal), FlexSlider (for slideshow)
Frameworks
Drupal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (canonical URL is https)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Matomo for privacy-respecting analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Matomo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a government/non-profit health promotion and victim protection resource in Austria.
  2. Content is comprehensive and well-structured with clear navigation.
  3. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity.
  4. No explicit privacy or cookie consent banner detected, which is recommended for GDPR compliance.
  5. Use of Matomo analytics indicates privacy-conscious tracking.
  6. No visible security headers detected in HTML content; server headers not provided for full analysis.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Drupal 10 CMS, a modern and widely supported platform, ensuring good maintainability and security updates. The integration of Matomo analytics reflects a privacy-focused approach. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with a clear navigation structure and professional design. Performance is moderate, likely due to image sizes and Drupal's complexity. No major technical debt or outdated technologies were detected. Hosting appears to be managed by or affiliated with Gesundheit Österreich GmbH, ensuring alignment with organizational policies. Opportunities exist to enhance security headers and implement cookie consent mechanisms to meet best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with toolbox-opferschutz.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review toolbox-opferschutz.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.