Skip to main content

Security report for toode.lv

SIA Toode · Manufacturing · Latvia

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA Toode is a medium-sized manufacturing company based in Latvia specializing in steel roofing and wall profiles, rainwater drainage systems, and related construction materials. The company has a regional presence with partner sites in Estonia, Lithuania, and Finland, positioning itself as a key player in the Baltic and Nordic construction materials market. Their website reflects a professional business with clear product offerings and a focus on construction professionals and building owners. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern JavaScript libraries and integrates Google Analytics and Cookiebot for tracking and compliance. However, performance is somewhat slow, and accessibility is basic. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and SPF/DMARC records but lacks advanced SSL features such as HSTS and OCSP stapling, and no security headers are detected. Privacy compliance is supported by a privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism, though no incident response or security policy is visible. Overall, the domain registration data is consistent and trustworthy, supporting the legitimacy of the business. Strategic improvements in security headers, SSL configuration, and incident response transparency would enhance the site's security and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching toode.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
50
Email security
75
DNS health
45
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
0
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the manufacturing sector, focusing on steel construction materials with a business model centered on direct sales and regional partnerships. Revenue indicators suggest a medium-sized enterprise with 30 sales locations and a 65 million EUR turnover in 2022. The target audience includes construction professionals and building owners in Latvia and neighboring countries. The company leverages BIM technology for product libraries, indicating a modern approach to construction industry needs. The website's external links to partner domains reinforce a collaborative regional strategy. Marketing and analytics tools are used moderately, with Google Ads and Google Analytics integrated. The absence of explicit terms of service and incident response policies suggests areas for governance improvement.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with TLS 1.3 and 1.2 protocols, ensuring encrypted communications. SPF and DMARC DNS records are correctly configured, reducing email spoofing risks. However, the lack of HSTS, OCSP stapling, and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options weakens the overall security posture. No vulnerabilities like Heartbleed or Logjam were detected. The absence of domain protection locks and incident response contacts indicates potential risks in domain management and security incident handling. The contact form collects personal data with validation, but no explicit security policy or data protection officer contact is provided. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but can be significantly improved with standard best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Enable HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload to enforce HTTPS.
  2. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  3. Activate OCSP stapling on the SSL certificate to improve revocation checking performance and security.
  4. Set domain protection locks to prevent unauthorized domain transfers or hijacking.
  5. Publish an incident response policy and provide dedicated security contact channels to improve transparency and readiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA Toode
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern JavaScript stack including jQuery, Slick Carousel, and Select2 for UI enhancements. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are used for tracking, alongside Cookiebot for cookie consent management. Hosting is provided by DigitalOcean, with DNS managed via DigitalOcean name servers. Performance is slow with a load time of approximately 6.6 seconds and a large page size (~700 KB). Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility features are basic. SEO is well implemented with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. The site lacks advanced security headers and some SSL features, indicating technical debt in security configuration. Overall, the infrastructure is solid but could benefit from performance optimization and enhanced security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with toode.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review toode.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.