Skip to main content

Security report for toode.lt

UAB Toode · Manufacturing · Lithuania

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

47/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

UAB Toode is a medium-sized Lithuanian company specializing in manufacturing and retailing steel roofing materials and accessories, with a strong presence in the Baltic region supported by factories in Estonia, Latvia, and Finland. The company holds recognized certifications such as ISO 9001 and CE marking, reinforcing its market position as a reputable supplier in the construction sector. Their website provides comprehensive product catalogs, customer testimonials, and multiple contact channels, targeting construction professionals and retail customers. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with WooCommerce, leveraging common web technologies and marketing tools like Google Analytics and Tag Manager. However, the site suffers from significant security shortcomings, notably the absence of a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS support, which critically undermines user trust and data protection. Privacy compliance is addressed through GDPR-aligned cookie consent and a privacy policy document, but terms of service and explicit security policies are missing. Overall, the website demonstrates good business credibility and content quality but requires urgent improvements in security infrastructure and performance optimization to enhance user trust and operational resilience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching toode.lt

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
0
Average
47

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the manufacturing and retail sectors, focusing on steel roofing products with a 25-year market presence. Its business model combines direct manufacturing with e-commerce retailing, serving both professional contractors and end consumers. The presence of ISO 9001 and CE certifications indicates adherence to quality standards, supporting competitive advantage. The website's integration with Google marketing and analytics tools suggests active digital marketing efforts. Contact information and physical addresses across multiple Lithuanian cities indicate a regional footprint. The company does not appear to have subsidiaries or parent companies listed, suggesting independent operation. The business targets the Baltic construction market, leveraging product quality and service responsiveness as key differentiators.

Security posture

The website's security posture is weak due to the lack of a valid SSL certificate and absence of HTTPS, exposing users to potential data interception risks. No modern TLS protocols are enabled, and critical security headers are missing, increasing vulnerability to common web attacks. While SPF and DMARC records are configured for email security, the overall web security hygiene is poor. The presence of a GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanism and a data protection officer contact are positive indicators, but the lack of incident response contacts or security policies limits preparedness. Immediate remediation of SSL/TLS and security headers is essential to protect user data and maintain compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire website.
  2. Configure and enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 or TLS 1.3) and disable insecure protocols.
  3. Implement essential HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  4. Enhance website performance by optimizing resource loading and reducing page size.
  5. Publish clear terms of service and security policy pages to improve transparency and compliance.
  6. Regularly audit and update DNS and email security configurations to maintain integrity.
  7. Improve accessibility features to meet modern standards and enhance user experience.
  8. Continue maintaining GDPR compliance with clear privacy policies and consent mechanisms.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
UAB Toode
VAT number
LT117240314
Registration number
111724034
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform with WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality, using the OnePress theme and common libraries such as jQuery and Bootstrap. Hosting is provided by Hostex.lt, as indicated by the nameservers. Performance metrics show a slow load time (~7 seconds) and a large page size (~516 KB) with over 100 resources, indicating potential optimization needs. The site uses Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking, along with a GDPR cookie compliance plugin. However, the absence of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols represent critical technical risks. The DNS setup includes valid SPF and DMARC records, but DNSSEC and CAA are not enabled. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but requires modernization and security hardening to meet current best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with toode.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review toode.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.