Skip to main content

Security report for ton.cz

Ton a.s. · Manufacturing · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ton a.s. is a well-established furniture manufacturer specializing in designed chairs and tables, with a heritage spanning over 160 years. The company targets a general audience interested in quality handcrafted furniture, positioning itself as a reputable player in the manufacturing sector. The website reflects this with professional design and clear branding, emphasizing craftsmanship and design excellence. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including JavaScript frameworks, Google Tag Manager, and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. The site is mobile-optimized and includes SEO best practices such as meta tags and structured data. However, some technical improvements could be made, such as adding security headers to enhance protection. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and implements a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism, indicating good privacy compliance. The extensive use of third-party analytics and marketing tools suggests a moderate to extensive user tracking level, but the presence of consent mechanisms aligns with GDPR requirements. The lack of a visible privacy policy or terms of service page is a minor gap. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy, with no signs of malicious content or security risks. The domain WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is standard for .eu domains, and does not raise concerns. Strategic recommendations include publishing explicit privacy and security policies, enhancing security headers, and providing more direct contact information to improve transparency and trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ton.cz

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
75
Email security
82
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
95
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Ton a.s. operates in the manufacturing sector with a focus on furniture design and production. Its long history and emphasis on handcrafted quality provide competitive advantages in brand reputation and product differentiation. The business model centers on direct sales of designed chairs and tables, targeting both individual consumers and possibly commercial clients. The website's integration with marketing and analytics platforms indicates active digital marketing efforts. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified, suggesting an independent medium-sized enterprise. Growth indicators include multilingual support and extensive online presence, although explicit revenue or partnership data is not available.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and a robust cookie consent mechanism that categorizes cookies by purpose and provider. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents an area for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency in security governance. Compliance with GDPR appears adequate through consent mechanisms, but explicit privacy policies are missing. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by formalizing policies and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the website footer.
  2. Implement standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to strengthen defense against common web attacks.
  3. Provide explicit security incident response contact information or a security.txt file to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Expand contact information to include verified company emails and physical addresses to enhance business credibility.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure compliance with privacy regulations and minimize unnecessary data collection.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ton a.s.
Description
Where design meets handcrafting. For over 160 years.
Key services
Design and manufacture of chairs, Design and manufacture of tables
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Vimeo Lite, HTML5, CSS3
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, HubSpot
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick, Facebook (Meta Platforms, Inc.)
Tracking pixels
Hotjar, HubSpot, Cookiebot
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Google AdSense
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with good SEO and mobile optimization
  2. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with detailed cookie categories and providers
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the provided content
  4. WHOIS data is not publicly available due to EURid privacy policy
  5. Contact phone number is provided in structured data but no email or physical address found
  6. Multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools are used, with extensive tracking
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found
  8. No security headers detected in provided data; recommend adding for improved security posture
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack with asynchronous loading of JavaScript resources, Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing tag management, and Cookiebot for GDPR-compliant cookie consent. The site is responsive and optimized for mobile devices, with preconnect hints to improve loading times for external resources like YouTube. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in accessibility features. The site lacks some security headers which are recommended for modern web applications. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and user-friendly experience but could benefit from enhanced security and accessibility measures.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ton.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ton.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.