Skip to main content

Security report for tobalt.lt

Tobalt · Technology · Lithuania

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Tobalt is a Lithuanian small business specializing in creating modern, professional websites and digital tools primarily for institutions and public sector organizations. Founded in 2019, the company offers a range of services including WordPress website development, e-commerce solutions, accessibility adaptations, and website maintenance. Their market position is focused on serving institutional clients with tailored digital solutions, supported by a professional website showcasing client logos and social media presence. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using Elementor, with integration of modern marketing and analytics tools such as Microsoft Clarity, Google Tag Manager, and Sendinblue. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly, though performance is moderate. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing a reliable infrastructure. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and Cloudflare DNS but lacks some recommended security headers and does not publish a security policy or incident response contacts. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the website is professional and credible but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security hardening to reduce risk and improve trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tobalt.lt

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
90
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention tobalt.lt, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
9
Employees
0
Customers
0
Third parties
9
Weak passwords
0%

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for tobalt.lt.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Tobalt operates in the technology sector with a niche focus on public sector and institutional clients in Lithuania. Their business model centers on service provision for website creation, e-commerce, and digital tools tailored to institutional needs. The company leverages partnerships and client references visible on the site to build trust. Revenue streams likely include project-based website development and ongoing maintenance contracts. The target audience is clearly defined, and the company maintains a consistent brand and digital presence. Growth indicators include recent content updates and video marketing assets. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to expand compliance offerings and security services to enhance market competitiveness.

Security posture

The current security posture is moderate. HTTPS is enforced, and Cloudflare provides DNS and CDN services, enhancing availability and basic protection. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, limiting transparency. Privacy compliance gaps exist due to missing privacy and cookie policies. No forms with visible security controls were found on the homepage. The site does not expose sensitive data or use outdated libraries. Overall, the security culture appears basic but could be improved with formal policies and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Establish and publish an incident response policy or contact channel (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email) to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting and improve trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Tobalt
Description
Internetinių svetainių kūrimas. Kuriame profesionalias interneto svetaines ir teikiame svetainiu priežiūra įstaigoms. Puslapių kurimas
Key services
Internetinių svetainių kūrimas, WordPress svetainių kūrimas, El. parduotuvės kūrimas, Pritaikymas neįgaliesiems, Svetainių priežiūra, Viešinimo paslaugos, Įrankiai įstaigoms
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Cloudflare (DNS/Name servers), Yoast SEO, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Sendinblue, Microsoft Outlook booking link
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS and CDN
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
Sendinblue
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Content is professionally presented and targeted at institutional clients
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap
  4. Contact information is clearly presented in header with phone and email
  5. Use of modern WordPress technologies and SEO best practices
  6. Security headers could be improved
  7. No visible forms collecting personal data on homepage
  8. Social media presence on Facebook and LinkedIn
  9. WHOIS data is transparent and consistent with business claims
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using Elementor for page building, supported by jQuery and various marketing scripts. Hosting is likely via a third party with Cloudflare DNS and CDN services enhancing performance and security. The site is mobile responsive and SEO optimized with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate, with some large images and video backgrounds. Accessibility is basic, with some attention to font sizes and layout. Technical debt appears low, but security header implementation and privacy compliance require improvement to meet best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tobalt.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tobalt.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.