Skip to main content

Security report for tmd.ee

TM Development · Other · Estonia

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

TM Development is a specialized exhibition design and development studio based in Estonia, operating since 2010. The company offers a comprehensive range of services including interactive design, technical planning, production, audiovisual solutions, installation, and maintenance primarily targeting museums, science centers, and production companies. Their portfolio includes over 50 exhibitions and hundreds of interactive exhibits, positioning them as an experienced niche player in the exhibition development market. The website is professionally designed using WordPress with modern plugins and technologies, providing good user experience and mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and error monitoring via Bugsnag, but lacks explicit security headers and privacy compliance documentation. The domain registration data is consistent and trustworthy, supporting the legitimacy of the business. Overall, the website reflects a credible and professional business with room for improvement in privacy and security policy transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tmd.ee

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates a service-based business model focused on exhibition and audiovisual development, serving a specialized market segment of cultural and educational institutions. Their competitive advantages include in-house development capabilities, competitive pricing, and full-service offerings from planning to maintenance. The presence of client logos and a detailed portfolio indicates a solid partnership ecosystem and market presence. The company targets clients requiring technical and creative exhibition solutions, leveraging a network of partners for design and multimedia services. Growth indicators include a decade-long operation and a substantial client base. The business appears to be small-sized but well-established within its niche.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and use of monitoring tools like Bugsnag. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of explicit privacy and cookie policies indicate gaps in compliance and best practices. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not publicly documented. The company should enhance its security posture by implementing recommended headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms, and establishing clear incident response contacts to improve trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance and consent mechanisms.
  2. Implement and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Add a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Provide clear contact information including security or abuse contacts to improve incident response readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
TM Development
Description
TM Development is a modern exhibition design and development studio. They offer various technical and audiovisual solutions from planning and development to implementation and maintenance. They have delivered over 50 exhibitions and hundreds of interactive exhibits since 2008. Their clients include museums, science centres, production companies, and project teams needing audiovisual or technical special solutions.
Key services
Interactive design, Technical planning, Production, Development (software, electronics, mechanics), Audiovisual special solutions, Design services (UX/UI, video, animation, 3D rendering), Installation services, Maintenance and repairs
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, WPBakery Page Builder, Slider Revolution, Google Analytics, Bugsnag, Google Maps API
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by canonical URL and Google Analytics forceSSL)
  • No exposed sensitive data found
  • Use of Bugsnag for error monitoring

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, MonsterInsights
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Leady
Marketing tools
MonsterInsights
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich.
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found.
  3. Contact information is primarily via contact form; no direct emails or phone numbers found on main page.
  4. Use of multiple third-party analytics and tracking scripts.
  5. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
  6. WHOIS data is consistent and domain is well-established.
  7. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using popular plugins such as Yoast SEO, WPBakery Page Builder, and Slider Revolution, indicating a mature and maintainable technical stack. The use of Google Analytics and MonsterInsights shows integration of analytics for performance and user behavior tracking. Hosting appears to be managed by Zone Media OÜ, consistent with WHOIS data. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Accessibility features are basic and could be improved. The technical infrastructure supports the business needs effectively but would benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy compliance implementations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tmd.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tmd.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.