Skip to main content

Security report for titans.sk

TITANS freelancers · Technology · Slovakia

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

TITANS freelancers is a Slovak-based IT outsourcing company specializing in providing reliable IT freelancers for various projects. With over a decade of experience, they position themselves as a leader in the Slovak IT outsourcing market, targeting both IT specialists seeking freelance work and companies needing skilled IT professionals. The website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including Bootstrap, jQuery, and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, and Cookiebot for GDPR-compliant cookie consent. Security measures include HTTPS, Google reCAPTCHA, and cookie consent mechanisms, though explicit security policies and headers could be enhanced. Overall, the site demonstrates a good balance of professional design, usability, and compliance, though lacks visible contact information and formal privacy or terms of service pages in the analyzed content.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching titans.sk

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
50
Email security
75
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector focusing on IT freelancer outsourcing, leveraging a business model that connects IT specialists with suitable projects. Their market position as a Slovak leader indicates strong local brand recognition and a mature service offering. The use of advanced marketing and analytics tools suggests a data-driven approach to customer acquisition and retention. Absence of visible contact details and formal policies may indicate areas for operational improvement. No evidence of parent or subsidiary companies was found, suggesting an independent medium-sized enterprise. The company targets IT professionals and businesses, indicating a B2B and B2C hybrid model.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and integrates Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms, indicating a baseline security posture. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, supporting GDPR compliance. However, explicit security headers like X-Frame-Options or Content-Security-Policy are not confirmed in the provided data, representing a potential area for enhancement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The lack of a published security policy or incident response information suggests limited transparency in security governance. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved with formalized policies and additional technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish explicit security headers such as X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy to enhance browser security.
  2. Create and make accessible a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response plan to demonstrate security governance and readiness.
  4. Add clear and verified contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
TITANS freelancers
Description
TITANS freelancers is an IT company overseeing a team of top IT freelancers. They offer attractive projects for IT specialists and have more than 10 years of experience renting IT freelancers for the right projects.
Key services
IT freelancer outsourcing, Freelance project matching
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, jQuery 3.7.1, Bootstrap CSS, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Cookiebot, Smartsupp Chat, Bing Ads, Google Ads, Google reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA
  • Cookie consent mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (implied via GTM), Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads, Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured for IT freelancer outsourcing.
  2. Strong use of modern analytics and marketing tools with proper cookie consent.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in the provided content.
  4. No direct contact information (email, phone, address) found in the analyzed content.
  5. Security posture is good but could be improved with explicit security policies and headers.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 using Bootstrap and jQuery, indicating a modern and widely supported technology stack. Integration with Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity, and Cookiebot shows a mature digital marketing and analytics infrastructure. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices evident from meta tags and structured data. Accessibility is basic and could be improved. Hosting provider details are not explicit. The site uses asynchronous loading for scripts to optimize performance. Overall, the technical implementation supports business goals but has room for improvement in accessibility and security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with titans.sk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review titans.sk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.