Skip to main content

Security report for titans.eu

TITANS.EU · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

TITANS.EU operates as a freelance IT job marketplace targeting developers and programmers, connecting freelancers with projects. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with a focus on trusted freelance IT work, leveraging over 10 years of market presence. The technical infrastructure is based on WordPress CMS with modern JavaScript libraries and integrations such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, and Smartsupp Live Chat, indicating a mature digital presence. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though the absence of security headers and explicit privacy policy pages suggests room for improvement. Overall, the site is accessible and functional with moderate to good performance and SEO optimization.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching titans.eu

This scan found 19 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business model centers on providing a platform for freelance IT professionals to find projects, serving a niche market of developers and programmers. The company appears to have a medium-sized operation with a focus on technology sector freelancers. The use of multiple marketing and analytics tools indicates an active approach to user engagement and advertising. However, the lack of explicit contact information and privacy policy pages may impact user trust and compliance. The partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed, and no related or subsidiary domains were identified. The company benefits from a consistent brand and a clear value proposition in the freelance IT job market.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security maturity with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms in place. The use of third-party analytics and marketing scripts introduces potential privacy and security risks that require ongoing monitoring. The absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and HSTS reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. Compliance with GDPR is partially indicated by the cookie consent but lacks a comprehensive privacy policy. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, which could be a gap in transparency and readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and HSTS to enhance security posture.
  3. Provide clear and accessible contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities and privacy risks.
  5. Consider publishing security policy and incident response information to demonstrate security maturity and readiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
TITANS.EU
Description
Trusted freelance IT work for programmers, developers and other specialists. We have connected IT freelancers with interesting projects for over 10 years.
Key services
Freelance IT job listings, Project matching for developers and programmers
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, jQuery 3.7.1, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Smartsupp Live Chat, Cookiebot
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy protection or query failure.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented and active.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  5. Multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts are used.
  6. Website uses WordPress CMS with modern versions of jQuery and plugins.
  7. No security headers detected in the provided data; recommend adding.
  8. No privacy policy or terms of service pages explicitly found in the content.
  9. Content is focused on freelance IT jobs and projects.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.3 with jQuery 3.7.1 and integrates multiple third-party services such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, and Smartsupp Live Chat. The site uses modern CSS and JavaScript techniques and is mobile optimized with responsive design. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and preloading of key images. SEO is supported by Yoast SEO plugin with proper meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with additional ARIA roles and keyboard navigation enhancements. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with titans.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review titans.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.