Skip to main content

Security report for tipsport.org

Tipsport.net · Other · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Tipsport.org is a domain registered to Tipsport.net, a Czech organization likely related to the well-known betting company Tipsport. The website content is extremely minimal, consisting only of a single image and a Cloudflare analytics script, with no metadata, contact information, or business descriptions present. The domain is mature, registered since 2009, and uses Cloudflare for DNS and analytics but lacks DNSSEC and security headers. No privacy or cookie policies are found, indicating low privacy compliance. The website does not appear to be blocked or protected by a WAF, but the lack of content and policies limits its usability and trustworthiness. Overall, the site appears to be a placeholder or minimal landing page rather than a fully developed business website.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of tipsport.org. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tipsport.org

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The domain is registered to Tipsport.net, a known entity in the Czech Republic, suggesting a legitimate business presence. However, the lack of visible business information, contact details, or service descriptions on the site limits insight into its market positioning or business model. The site likely serves as a minimal informational or redirect page related to the larger Tipsport brand. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the content. The business sector is classified as 'Other' due to insufficient data. The domain age supports a stable presence but the minimal site content suggests limited direct customer engagement on this domain.

Security posture

The security posture is basic with HTTPS implied but no explicit security headers detected. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a missed opportunity to enhance domain security. The site uses Cloudflare for DNS and analytics, providing some protection and performance benefits. No forms or inputs are present, reducing attack surface but also limiting functionality. No incident response or security policy information is available, indicating low transparency. Privacy compliance is poor due to missing policies. Overall, the site has a low security maturity level with room for improvement in security best practices and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve domain name system security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to enhance compliance and user trust.
  3. Add contact information and incident response details to improve transparency and support.
  4. Incorporate security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to harden the site against common attacks.
  5. Develop richer website content and metadata to improve SEO, user experience, and business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Tipsport.net
Description
Tipsport.net is the organization behind the domain tipsport.org. The domain appears related to Tipsport, a known betting and gambling company in the Czech Republic, but no direct business description is present in the provided content.
Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Cloudflare Insights
Performance
moderate
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Cloudflare Insights
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cloudflare Insights
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is extremely minimal with only an image and a single script.
  2. No metadata, Open Graph, or structured data found.
  3. No forms or contact information present.
  4. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies detected.
  5. Uses Cloudflare for DNS and analytics but DNSSEC is not enabled.
  6. No security headers detected in the provided data.
  7. No social media or external business contact links found.
  8. WHOIS data is consistent and domain is legitimate and mature.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Cloudflare for DNS and analytics, indicating a modern infrastructure component. The HTML content is minimal with no metadata, structured data, or SEO tags, limiting discoverability and user engagement. No CMS or frameworks are detected. Performance is likely moderate due to Cloudflare's CDN, but the lack of content and optimization features suggests limited technical sophistication. Accessibility and mobile optimization cannot be assessed due to minimal content. The site would benefit from modernization including richer content, SEO enhancements, and security improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 65/100Medium32 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tipsport.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tipsport.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.