Skip to main content

Security report for tim-sa.fr

TIM s.a.s. · Manufacturing · France

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

TIM s.a.s. is a small manufacturing and retail company based in Reims, France, specializing in fencing, gates, motorization, and aluminum and plastic profiles. The company targets both professionals and private individuals, offering a broad range of products including industrial and residential fencing, motorization systems, and related accessories. Their market position is regional with a focus on quality professional products and services such as delivery and professional accounts. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear contact information and comprehensive product offerings. Technically, the website uses a modern tech stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, and FontAwesome, and integrates a consent management platform for GDPR compliance. The site is mobile-optimized and provides good SEO and accessibility basics. Security-wise, HTTPS is used and cookie consent is implemented, but explicit security headers and incident response information are missing. The WHOIS data is unavailable, which slightly reduces trust but the overall site and business presentation are legitimate and professional. Recommendations include enhancing security headers, adding incident response contacts, and maintaining regular audits of third-party scripts.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tim-sa.fr

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
55
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

TIM s.a.s. operates in the manufacturing and retail sectors, focusing on fencing and related products. Their business model is supplier and distributor oriented, serving both private and professional customers. The company leverages a regional presence in Reims, France, and offers value-added services such as delivery and professional accounts. The website content and navigation are well-structured, supporting customer engagement and product discovery. Partnerships with local web development firms (Cyber Création) and use of third-party consent management indicate a mature digital presence. No direct competitors or subsidiaries are identified from the data. The company maintains a professional online presence with trust signals such as clear contact details, privacy policies, and terms of service.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and a cookie consent mechanism in place, indicating GDPR awareness. However, the absence of visible security headers (e.g., Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options) and lack of published security or incident response policies limit the security maturity. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics and Consentmanager.net CMP is standard but requires ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. The lack of WHOIS data reduces transparency but is likely due to privacy protection. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business but could be improved with enhanced headers and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
  5. Maintain transparency by ensuring WHOIS data is accurate and accessible if possible.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
TIM s.a.s.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
TIM s.a.s.
Description
Clôture portail motorisation à Reims. Contrôle d'accès et vidéo surveillance. Profils et tôles aluminium et plastique.
Key services
Clôtures, Portails, Motorisation, Profils aluminium, Profils plastique, Livraison & Grutage, Compte professionnel
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 2.1.1, Bootstrap, Google Fonts (Open Sans, Raleway), FontAwesome Pro 6, Owl Carousel, Revolution Slider, Consentmanager.net CMP
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage (implied by https URLs)
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (gtag.js)
Marketing tools
Consentmanager.net CMP
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. No WHOIS data available from AFNIC, possibly due to domain registration issues or privacy protection
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy policy implemented
  4. No explicit security policy or incident response contact found
  5. No visible vulnerabilities or security issues in the HTML content
  6. Business contact information is clearly provided and consistent
  7. Use of modern web technologies and libraries
  8. No suspicious or malicious external links detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including jQuery 2.1.1, Bootstrap, FontAwesome Pro 6, Owl Carousel, and Revolution Slider. It uses Google Fonts for typography and integrates Google Analytics for traffic analysis. The site employs a consent management platform from consentmanager.net to comply with GDPR cookie regulations. The HTML structure is valid and the site is mobile responsive with good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, with multiple CSS and JS files loaded from the same domain and external CDNs. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Hosting provider details are not available from the content. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional and functional website with room for performance optimization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tim-sa.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tim-sa.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.