Skip to main content

Security report for tim-kabel.hr

TimKabel · Telecommunications · Croatia

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

TimKabel is a Croatian telecommunications company with a domain registered since 2001, indicating a stable and established presence in the local market. The website is built on WordPress and uses modern tools such as Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection and Cookiebot for cookie consent management, reflecting a reasonable level of digital maturity. SEO is enhanced by the Yoast SEO plugin, and the site is served over HTTPS, ensuring secure communications. However, explicit privacy policies and terms of service are not found in the provided content, which may impact compliance and user trust. The absence of direct contact information on the visible content limits immediate customer engagement opportunities. Overall, the website presents a professional and consistent brand image with moderate security and privacy compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tim-kabel.hr

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
80
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the telecommunications sector, likely providing cable and related services primarily in Croatia. The business model appears to be service-oriented, targeting both general consumers and business clients. The domain age and registrar information align with the company's local presence, enhancing credibility. The use of Google services for analytics and advertising suggests active marketing efforts. However, the lack of visible contact details and formal policies may indicate areas for improvement in customer support and regulatory compliance. No partnerships or subsidiaries are explicitly identified from the website content.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and the use of Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate automated abuse. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or security policy information is published, which may hinder transparency and preparedness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. Enhancing security headers and publishing clear security policies would improve the overall security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve transparency and regulatory compliance.
  3. Add clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers to facilitate customer and security incident communications.
  4. Develop and publish a security policy and incident response contact details to enhance trust and preparedness.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate risks from external libraries.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
TimKabel
Description
TimKabel appears to be a company operating in the telecommunications sector, likely providing cable and related services in Croatia.
Key services
Cable services, Telecommunications solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google reCAPTCHA, Cookiebot, Yoast SEO, WordPress
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google
Tracking pixels
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS and modern cookie consent management via Cookiebot.
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the visible content.
  4. Use of Google services for analytics and bot protection is evident.
  5. Website is built on WordPress with Yoast SEO plugin for SEO optimization.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  8. Content is primarily in Croatian language with some English metadata.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress, leveraging Yoast SEO for search engine optimization and Cookiebot for cookie management. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are used for marketing and analytics purposes. The site loads asynchronously loaded scripts for performance and uses modern meta tags for SEO and social media integration. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility features are basic. Hosting details are not explicit beyond the registrar being CARNET. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in accessibility and security header implementation. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from modernization in security practices and enhanced user engagement features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tim-kabel.hr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tim-kabel.hr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.