Skip to main content

Security report for tigreblanc.fr

tigreblanc® · Other · France

Critical risk. 18 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 4 other checks.

Security score

23/100

Risk levelCritical

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

tigreblanc® is a French creative branding agency specializing in branding, print, digital, and image services. With over 30 years of experience led by founder Guillaume, the agency serves clients primarily in France and Belgium, focusing on strategic brand development and communication. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, targeting businesses seeking comprehensive branding and communication solutions. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern frameworks like Bootstrap and integrates Google Tag Manager and Axeptio for analytics and cookie consent, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent but lacks explicit security policies or incident response information. The absence of WHOIS data is a concern for domain transparency but does not detract significantly from the overall professionalism and trustworthiness of the site. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing security policies, and adding vulnerability disclosure mechanisms.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

18 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tigreblanc.fr

This scan found 30 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
45
Email security
5
DNS health
55
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
23

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The agency positions itself as a boutique creative firm with a strong emphasis on identity and brand transformation. Its business model revolves around consulting, design, event management, and communication services. The parent company affiliation with Copylot Group suggests a broader corporate backing. The agency maintains active social media channels and a well-structured website optimized for SEO and user experience. Revenue streams likely come from client projects in branding and communication sectors. The target market includes private and public sector clients in France and Belgium. Growth indicators include recent project showcases and updated content. The partnership ecosystem includes Copylot Group and digital service providers. Overall, tigreblanc® demonstrates a stable market presence with potential for expansion.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and integrates cookie consent mechanisms, reflecting compliance with basic security and privacy standards. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of published security or incident response policies indicate room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager and Axeptio is standard but requires ongoing monitoring for security risks. The missing WHOIS data reduces domain transparency and trust but does not indicate malicious intent. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with recommendations to enhance header policies and publish security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance domain registration transparency by ensuring WHOIS data is available or justified if privacy protected.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
tigreblanc®
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
tigreblanc®
Description
Agence de branding, print, digital et image. Développe le beau sens des marques et entreprises via une approche identitaire.
Key services
Branding, Print, Digital, Image, Strategy, Design, Event, Communication
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Bootstrap 3.3.7, jQuery 3.1.1, Google Tag Manager, Yoast SEO plugin, Axeptio cookie consent, Slick Carousel, Animate.css, FontAwesome, Genericons
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Axeptio cookie consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Professional branding agency site with clear service offerings
  3. Good use of modern web technologies and SEO practices
  4. Cookie consent implemented via Axeptio
  5. WHOIS data unavailable, which is a concern for domain transparency
  6. No explicit security policies or incident response info published
  7. Contact info is available via modals and footer
  8. Social media presence on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram
  9. No adult or questionable content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using Bootstrap 3.3.7 for responsive design and jQuery 3.1.1 for interactivity. It leverages Google Tag Manager for analytics and Axeptio for cookie consent management, indicating compliance with privacy regulations. The site uses modern CSS animations and slick carousel for UI enhancements. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices implemented via Yoast SEO plugin. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. No hosting provider information was detected. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from modernization of some libraries and enhanced accessibility features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tigreblanc.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tigreblanc.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.