Skip to main content

Security report for tigertech.net

Tiger Technologies LLC · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Tiger Technologies LLC is a well-established web hosting provider founded in 2000, offering affordable and reliable hosting services with a focus on green, carbon-neutral operations. Their service includes free domain registration, email hosting, SSL certificates, and WordPress support, targeting individuals and businesses seeking dependable web hosting solutions. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation and relevant content, supporting a positive user experience and trustworthiness. Technically, the site uses standard web technologies with moderate performance and basic mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and free wildcard SSL certificates, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers, and does not publish formal security or incident response policies. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie policy or consent mechanism. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the business claims, supporting legitimacy and trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tigertech.net

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
60
Email security
65
DNS health
90
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
53
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention tigertech.net, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
667
Employees
0
Customers
667
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
16%

22 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for tigertech.net.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Tiger Technologies operates in the technology sector as a small-sized company focused on web hosting and domain registration services. Their competitive advantages include long-standing market presence, green hosting initiatives, and customer-centric policies such as no setup fees and a 90-day money-back guarantee. The business model centers on subscription-based hosting plans with additional domain services. The company maintains a consistent brand and trust signals through testimonials and guarantees. The ecosystem includes multiple related domains under their control but no identified external partners or subsidiaries. Growth indicators are stable with a focus on reliability and customer support.

Security posture

The security maturity level of Tiger Technologies is moderate. The website enforces HTTPS with free wildcard SSL certificates and provides spam and virus protection for hosted email. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers, and published security policies indicates room for improvement. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure or incident response procedures publicly available. Data protection practices are basic, with WHOIS privacy protection offered to customers but not applied to the company domain. Compliance with GDPR is partial, lacking cookie consent mechanisms. The security culture appears customer-focused but could benefit from formalized policies and enhanced technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and publicly document a comprehensive security policy and incident response plan.
  3. Add a cookie policy and consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance and user privacy transparency.
  4. Deploy standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to harden the website against common attacks.
  5. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to foster responsible security reporting and transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Tiger Technologies LLC
Description
Tiger Technologies offers Web hosting services for $11.95 per month, including a free .com, .net or .org domain name. No setup fees or long-term contracts required.
Key services
Web hosting, Domain name registration, Email hosting, WordPress installation, SSL certificates, Spam and virus protection, Backups and restores
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Free wildcard SSL certificates from Let's Encrypt
  • Free WHOIS privacy protection
  • Spam and virus filtering
  • No setup fees reduces risk of hidden charges

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Content is professionally presented with clear navigation and relevant business information
  3. No explicit cookie policy or consent mechanism found
  4. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers visible on homepage; contact form available
  5. Security headers not detected in HTML content; SSL is enabled with Let's Encrypt wildcard certificates
  6. WHOIS data is consistent and supports legitimacy of the business
  7. Website promotes green, carbon neutral hosting as a differentiator
  8. No social media links or phone numbers found in the provided content
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using standard HTML, CSS, and JavaScript without reliance on major CMS platforms or frameworks. Hosting is managed internally by Tiger Technologies LLC, indicating control over infrastructure. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation. Technical debt appears low, but modernization opportunities include adding security headers, improving mobile responsiveness, and enabling DNSSEC. The absence of analytics or tracking scripts suggests minimal data collection, which aligns with privacy-conscious practices but limits marketing insights.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tigertech.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tigertech.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.