Skip to main content

Security report for tigertech.biz

Tiger Technologies · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Tiger Technologies is a small, established web hosting provider offering affordable and reliable hosting services with a focus on green, carbon-neutral operations. Their business model centers on subscription-based web hosting plans that include free domain registration and a variety of hosting features such as spam protection, SSL certificates, and one-click WordPress installation. The company targets individuals and businesses seeking dependable hosting solutions without setup fees or long-term contracts. Technically, the website is well-structured with modern HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, providing a good user experience and mobile optimization. However, no advanced frameworks or CMS platforms are detected, indicating a straightforward custom implementation. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced, free wildcard SSL certificates, and spam filtering, but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies. The absence of WHOIS data raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy, although the website content and service offerings appear professional and trustworthy. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the site scores well in business credibility and security but could improve in privacy compliance and transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tigertech.biz

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
60
Email security
65
DNS health
90
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
53
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention tigertech.biz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for tigertech.biz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Tiger Technologies operates in the technology sector, specifically in web hosting and domain registration services. Founded in 1999, it has a long-standing presence in the market, positioning itself as a reliable and environmentally conscious hosting provider. The company leverages a subscription business model with competitive pricing and value-added services such as free domain names and carbon-neutral hosting. Its target customers include small businesses and individuals looking for affordable hosting with strong uptime guarantees and customer support. The company maintains a consistent brand image and offers trust signals like money-back guarantees and uptime SLAs. The ecosystem includes related subdomains for support, webmail, and status monitoring, indicating a mature operational infrastructure. However, the lack of public WHOIS data and limited direct contact information may impact customer trust and regulatory compliance.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS, free SSL certificates, and spam/virus filtering integrated into its hosting plans. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, which could hinder timely communication and remediation of security issues. Privacy compliance is partial; while a privacy policy exists, there is no cookie consent mechanism, which may not fully satisfy GDPR requirements. The absence of WHOIS data is a notable risk factor, as it impairs domain ownership verification and trust. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by adding explicit security policies, improving privacy compliance, and publishing vulnerability disclosure information.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Add a visible cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to improve privacy compliance and GDPR adherence.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting and handling of security issues.
  4. Investigate and resolve the absence of WHOIS data to improve domain registration transparency and trustworthiness.
  5. Enhance contact information availability by providing verified company emails and phone numbers for support and security contacts.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Tiger Technologies
Description
Tiger Technologies offers Web hosting services for $11.95 per month, including a free .com, .net or .org domain name. No setup fees or long-term contracts required.
Key services
Web hosting, Domain name registration, Email hosting, Spam and virus protection, One-click WordPress installation, Free SSL certificates, Backups and restores
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Free wildcard SSL certificate
  • Free WHOIS privacy protection
  • Spam and virus filtering

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no WAF or blocking detected
  2. No explicit cookie consent mechanism found
  3. WHOIS data unavailable, raising questions about domain registration status
  4. Website content is professional and well-structured
  5. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities detected
  6. No social media links or direct contact emails visible on homepage
  7. Contact available only via support/contact page
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a simple, custom-built technical stack primarily based on HTML, CSS, and JavaScript without reliance on major CMS or frameworks. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and professional design. Performance is moderate, with no explicit indicators of advanced optimization or CDN usage. The hosting infrastructure appears stable with uptime and backup guarantees. However, the lack of modern security headers and absence of advanced analytics or tracking tools suggest opportunities for modernization. The technical debt is low given the straightforward implementation, but adding modern security and privacy features would reduce operational risks and improve compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tigertech.biz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tigertech.biz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.