Skip to main content

Security report for ticketpoint.nl

Ticketpoint · E-commerce · Netherlands

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ticketpoint is a well-established Dutch ticket sales platform operating since 2003 under the legal entity Superior B.V. The company specializes in selling tickets for concerts, sports events, festivals, and theater performances, targeting event attendees primarily in the Netherlands. The website is multilingual, supporting Dutch, English, and German, and offers a comprehensive event catalog with direct ticket purchasing options. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and libraries, including Yoast SEO, WPML for multilingual support, and various JavaScript libraries for UI and calendar functionalities. The site employs HTTPS with good SSL configuration and integrates privacy compliance tools such as Cookiebot and reCAPTCHA for form security. Security badges and trust signals are prominently displayed, enhancing user confidence. However, explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not found, representing an area for improvement. Overall, the website demonstrates a solid security posture, good privacy compliance, and a professional digital presence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ticketpoint.nl

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention ticketpoint.nl, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
96
Employees
0
Customers
96
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
35%

6 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for ticketpoint.nl.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Ticketpoint holds a strong market position as an official ticket reseller with over 20 years of operation, supported by consistent domain registration and a clear business model focused on event ticket sales. The company leverages partnerships and trust badges to reinforce legitimacy. Its business model is e-commerce centric, targeting consumers seeking tickets for various entertainment events. The presence of multilingual support indicates a strategy to reach broader European audiences. The company maintains active social media channels for marketing and customer engagement. Revenue streams likely include direct ticket sales and possibly event promotion services. The website's content and navigation are designed to facilitate easy discovery and purchase of tickets, supporting customer retention and growth.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, uses reCAPTCHA on forms to mitigate spam, and integrates Cookiebot for GDPR-compliant cookie consent management. Security badges such as 'Beveiligd bestelproces' and 'Weet waar je koopt' are displayed, indicating adherence to recognized security standards in the ticketing industry. However, no explicit security headers were detected in the HTML content, and no published security or incident response policies were found. There is no evidence of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file. The site uses several third-party scripts, including Facebook Pixel and Google Tag Manager, which require ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by adding formal security policies and technical security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page and provide incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate risks from vulnerable components.
  5. Enhance website accessibility compliance to improve user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ticketpoint
Description
Ticketpoint is het officiële verkooppunt van tickets voor concerten, (sport)evenementen, festivals en theatervoorstellingen.
Key services
Ticket sales for concerts, Ticket sales for sports events, Ticket sales for festivals, Ticket sales for theater performances, Event promotion and registration
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, WPML (multilingual), jQuery, Bootstrap 4, FullCalendar, Slick Carousel, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Facebook Pixel, reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA on newsletter signup form
  • Cookie consent via Cookiebot
  • Use of security badges (Beveiligd bestelproces, Weet waar je koopt)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Cookiebot, Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible and functional
  2. Content is primarily in Dutch with English and German language options
  3. Multiple event categories with ticket sales functionality
  4. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices
  5. Presence of GDPR-compliant cookie consent and privacy policy
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies found
  7. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Bootstrap 4, FullCalendar, and Slick Carousel for UI components. SEO is managed via Yoast SEO plugin, and multilingual support is provided by WPML. The site uses Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. Cookiebot manages cookie consent, ensuring GDPR compliance. Performance is moderate with lazy loading and caching via WP Rocket. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design. No major technical debt or outdated technologies were detected. Hosting provider details are not explicit. The site could benefit from enhanced security headers and further performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ticketpoint.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ticketpoint.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.