Skip to main content

Security report for thunderkick.com

Thunderkick · Technology · Sweden

High risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Thunderkick is an independent casino game supplier founded in 2012 and headquartered in Stockholm, Sweden. The company specializes in developing innovative and creative casino games, targeting online casino operators and players. Their market position is that of a dynamic and growing player in the gaming technology sector, supported by multiple gambling licenses from reputable authorities. The website reflects a professional and modern digital presence with strong branding and clear business messaging. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern libraries and integrations such as Cookiebot for consent management, Google Tag Manager, and reCAPTCHA for form security. The security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced, consent mechanisms in place, and no visible vulnerabilities, although some security headers could be improved. Overall, the site demonstrates good compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations, with detailed cookie declarations and privacy policies. The domain registration data aligns well with the company's claims, supporting legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
70/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching thunderkick.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
70
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
70
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Thunderkick operates in the technology sector, specifically focusing on casino game development and distribution. Their business model is B2B, supplying games to online casino operators. The company leverages a strong licensing framework to ensure regulatory compliance across multiple jurisdictions. Their partnership ecosystem includes embedded video content providers like YouTube, Twitch, and Vimeo, enhancing marketing and user engagement. The presence of a client area and job portal indicates a mature operational structure. Growth indicators include recent game releases and active news updates. The company maintains a transparent privacy and cookie policy, enhancing trust with users and partners.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and integration of Google reCAPTCHA on forms to prevent abuse. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, ensuring compliance with privacy laws. However, explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not visibly configured, which could be improved to mitigate clickjacking and content injection risks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Incident response and security policy documents are not publicly available, representing a potential gap in transparency. Overall, the security maturity is good but could benefit from enhanced header configurations and published security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen defense-in-depth.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Introduce a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate risks from known vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance monitoring and logging capabilities to detect and respond to potential security incidents promptly.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Thunderkick
Description
Thunderkick is an independent and dynamic casino game supplier headquartered in Stockholm, founded in 2012. They focus on innovative and creative gaming experiences with a hint of magical madness.
Key services
Casino game development, Game distribution, Client area services
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Splide.js (carousel), Cookiebot, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, Contact Form 7
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
YouTube (embedded video), Twitch (embedded content), Vimeo (embedded content)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA on forms
  • Cookie consent management via Cookiebot
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (implied by WordPress and Contact Form 7)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google
Tracking pixels
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration
  2. Cookie consent managed by Cookiebot with detailed cookie declaration
  3. Multiple gambling licenses displayed indicating regulatory compliance
  4. Contact forms protected by Google reCAPTCHA
  5. Embedded videos from trusted platforms (YouTube, Twitch, Vimeo)
  6. No suspicious or malicious content detected
  7. Clear business and legal information provided
  8. Good SEO and accessibility practices observed
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries such as Splide.js for carousels and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are integrated for marketing and analytics purposes. The site includes embedded video content from YouTube, Twitch, and Vimeo, enhancing multimedia engagement. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is well implemented with comprehensive meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format. The technical infrastructure appears stable and professionally maintained, though hosting provider details are not explicitly disclosed. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and further optimize performance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with thunderkick.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review thunderkick.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.