Skip to main content

Security report for threenow.co.nz

Three NZ · Telecommunications · New Zealand

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in DNS health, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website content analyzed is a region-restriction error page for the domain cdn.fullscreen.nz, indicating that the content is only available in New Zealand. The page is minimalistic, with no interactive elements, forms, or contact information. The metadata and Open Graph tags identify the site as related to Three NZ, a telecommunications or media service provider in New Zealand. The lack of WHOIS data for the subdomain is typical for CDN subdomains and does not indicate suspicious activity. The technical infrastructure is basic, with no advanced frameworks or analytics detected. Security posture is minimal with no security headers or privacy policies present. Overall, the site is functional for its purpose but lacks comprehensive security and privacy features.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • Critical

      DNS Resolution Failed

      Unable to resolve domain A records

      What to do: Verify domain is properly configured and not expired

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching threenow.co.nz

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
45
DNS health
40
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business appears to be a New Zealand-focused telecommunications or media content provider, likely Three NZ. The site uses geo-restriction to limit content access to New Zealand residents. The business model involves content delivery with regional restrictions. There is no direct evidence of revenue streams or partnerships from this page alone. The market position is regional with a focus on New Zealand users. The lack of contact or policy information on this page limits deeper business insights.

Security posture

The security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but no detected security headers or privacy policies. No forms or user input fields reduce attack surface. The absence of WHOIS data for the subdomain is normal for CDN usage. No vulnerabilities or malware indicators were found. The site would benefit from implementing standard security headers and privacy compliance measures to improve trust and security.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Ensure HTTPS is enforced site-wide with strong TLS configuration.
  4. Provide contact information or links to corporate sites for better business credibility.
  5. Consider adding analytics and monitoring to track user access and improve service.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Three NZ
Description
The website content indicates a region-restricted service, specifically targeting New Zealand users. The site appears to be related to Three NZ, a telecommunications provider or media service in New Zealand.
Key services
Content delivery restricted by region
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. The page is a region-restriction error page indicating content is only available in New Zealand.
  2. No WHOIS data available for the subdomain, typical for CDN subdomains.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on this page.
  4. No contact information or forms present.
  5. No scripts or analytics detected in the HTML content.
  6. Minimal content and basic design consistent with an error page.
  7. No security headers or advanced security features detected.
  8. No adult or explicit content detected.
  9. No WAF or security challenge detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The site uses basic HTML5 and CSS with no detected JavaScript frameworks or CMS. The page is lightweight and mobile optimized. No analytics or tracking scripts were found, indicating minimal data collection. Hosting appears to be via a CDN subdomain, likely fullscreen.nz's infrastructure. Performance is moderate given the minimal content. The site lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features but is functional for its purpose as a region restriction notice.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with threenow.co.nz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review threenow.co.nz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.