Skip to main content

Security report for think-thanks.com

Think Thanks · Technology · Argentina

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Think Thanks is a boutique consultancy specializing in marketing, strategy, digital transformation, and sustainability with over 15 years of experience. The company targets businesses seeking innovative and strategic solutions to evolve and grow, primarily in Latin America, with Argentina as the detected country of operation. Their service offerings include consulting and execution in marketing, branding, UX/UI, data strategy, and growth marketing. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with good content quality and clear navigation. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using Elementor and Yoast SEO, with integrations for Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and domain protection flags but lacks DNSSEC and security headers, which are recommended for improvement. Privacy compliance is weak due to the absence of privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site is trustworthy and credible but could enhance user trust and compliance by addressing privacy and security policy gaps.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching think-thanks.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a strategic partner for digital and cultural transformation, emphasizing co-creation and passion for change. Its business model is service-oriented, focusing on consulting and execution in marketing and strategy. The firm has a regional presence with mentions of Mexico, Peru, Argentina, Ecuador, Chile, Uruguay, and Central America, indicating a medium-sized operation. Partnerships such as with MNDRN for design and development suggest a collaborative ecosystem. The website's content and structure support a professional image aimed at corporate clients. Growth indicators include a broad service portfolio and active social media engagement. No direct revenue or financial data is available, but the longevity and domain age support business stability.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, uses reCAPTCHA v3 to protect forms, and has domain status flags that prevent unauthorized domain changes. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no security HTTP headers were detected in the provided data, which are important for mitigating common web attacks. There is no published security policy or incident response contact information, which limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified. The use of third-party tracking and marketing scripts introduces moderate user tracking but no apparent privacy safeguards. Overall, the security posture is moderate but can be significantly improved by implementing recommended security headers, DNSSEC, and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security HTTP headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  4. Add a security policy page and provide incident response contact channels (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails).
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and reduce tracking footprint.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Think Thanks
Description
Consultora en innovación, marketing y sostenibilidad. Una compañía boutique con capacidad de adaptarse y acompañar a empresas desde el diseño de la estrategia hasta su implementación, con más de 15 años de experiencia.
Key services
Marketing consulting and execution, Strategy development, Digital transformation, Sustainability consulting, Growth marketing, Branding, UX/UI, Data strategy
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA v3, Facebook Pixel
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of reCAPTCHA v3 on forms
  • Security flags on domain (clientDeleteProhibited, clientRenewProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO, Elementor, Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the homepage or footer.
  3. Contact information includes a verified company email and a newsletter subscription form.
  4. Social media presence is active with LinkedIn and Instagram links.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices is evident.
  6. Security practices are basic but could be improved with DNSSEC and security headers.
  7. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data detected.
  8. Business appears to be a medium-sized boutique consultancy focused on marketing, strategy, and sustainability in Latin America.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using Elementor for page building and Yoast SEO for search optimization. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing purposes. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and uses Google Fonts for typography. Performance is moderate, with no critical errors detected. The technical stack is mature but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance optimizations. The absence of DNSSEC and security headers represents technical debt that should be addressed to reduce risk. The site uses asynchronous loading for scripts and optimized CSS loading, indicating attention to performance best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with think-thanks.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review think-thanks.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.