Skip to main content

Security report for themefreesia.com

ThemeFreesia · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ThemeFreesia is a small technology company specializing in the development and distribution of free and premium responsive WordPress themes and plugins. Their market position is focused on providing accessible, stylish, and functional WordPress solutions primarily targeting business owners, designers, and bloggers. The company offers a business model combining free themes with paid 'Plus' plugins to enhance functionality and support. The website demonstrates a good level of digital maturity with a WordPress CMS infrastructure, integration of modern technologies such as Google Analytics, reCAPTCHA, WooCommerce, and SEO optimization via Yoast. Hosting is provided by Bluehost with Cloudflare DNS services, ensuring reliable uptime and performance. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enforced and use of reCAPTCHA, but lacks DNSSEC and explicit security headers. Privacy compliance is basic with a privacy policy and cookie consent banner present, though GDPR compliance is not explicitly indicated. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and safe for general audiences, with room for improvement in security policies and technical hardening.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching themefreesia.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ThemeFreesia operates in the competitive WordPress theme and plugin market, leveraging a freemium business model that attracts users with free themes and converts some to paid plugins. Their target customers include small business owners, designers, and bloggers seeking customizable and responsive WordPress solutions. The company maintains an active online presence with social media channels and a support ticket system. Revenue streams likely include sales of Plus plugins and possibly support services. The company’s longevity since 2015 indicates stability and experience. Partnerships appear limited to internal support infrastructure. Growth indicators include regular theme/plugin updates and demos. Strategic observations suggest focusing on enhancing security transparency and expanding marketing efforts to increase market share.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms, which are positive security measures. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options represents gaps that could be exploited. No security policy or incident response contact information is published, which limits transparency and preparedness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Privacy compliance is basic, with cookie consent implemented but no explicit GDPR statements. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be improved by adopting additional security headers, enabling DNSSEC, and publishing clear security policies and incident response procedures.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Regularly audit and update all WordPress plugins and themes to minimize vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance GDPR compliance by explicitly stating data processing practices and user rights in the privacy policy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ThemeFreesia
Description
Theme Freesia is a WordPress Themes/ Plugins developing Company by Freesia Team. They design responsive beautiful WordPress Themes & Plugins that help customers in daily life activities. They offer free and premium responsive WordPress themes and plugins with support and features.
Key services
WordPress themes, WordPress plugins, Support services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, JavaScript, jQuery, Google Analytics, Google reCAPTCHA, WooCommerce, Yoast SEO, Mailchimp for WordPress, Jetpack
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Jetpack Stats
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Jetpack Stats
Marketing tools
Mailchimp
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based theme and plugin provider with free and premium offerings.
  2. Content is well structured with clear navigation and multiple CTAs for demos and downloads.
  3. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact primarily via forms and support ticket system.
  5. Cookie consent banner present indicating some privacy compliance effort.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
  7. No DNSSEC enabled which is a minor security gap.
  8. Social media presence on Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube linked.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including PHP, JavaScript, jQuery, and integration of popular plugins such as WooCommerce, Yoast SEO, Jetpack, and Mailchimp for WordPress. Hosting is provided by Bluehost with Cloudflare DNS, indicating a reliable infrastructure. Performance is moderate with standard optimizations and mobile responsiveness. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. The site uses Google Analytics and Jetpack Stats for visitor tracking. No critical technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected, but enabling DNSSEC and security headers would improve the technical security posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 66/100Medium32 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with themefreesia.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review themefreesia.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.