Skip to main content

Security report for thegazette.co.uk

TSO (The Stationery Office) · Government · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Gazette is the UK's official public record publication, established in 1665 and published by TSO under the authority of His Majesty's Stationery Office, part of The National Archives. It serves as a trusted source for official notices including insolvency, wills and probate, company data, and historical archives. The website targets businesses, legal professionals, government entities, and the general public seeking authoritative public records. Its business model includes providing official notices, data services, and archival access with paid options for notice placement and data subscriptions. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript libraries such as RequireJS and Modernizr, uses Matomo Analytics with consent management, and integrates a live chat widget for customer support. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile devices, with good accessibility and SEO practices. The presence of cookie consent banners and privacy policies indicates a mature approach to privacy compliance. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent mechanisms to manage analytics tracking. However, it lacks explicit security policy pages and incident response information, and security headers are not visibly present in the HTML. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be improved with additional transparency and technical controls. The domain WHOIS data is unavailable due to Nominet UK restrictions, consistent with the domain being government-controlled. This lack of public WHOIS data does not detract from the site's legitimacy given its official status. The site is trustworthy, professionally maintained, and safe for general audiences.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching thegazette.co.uk

This scan found 13 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
80
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention thegazette.co.uk, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
298
Employees
0
Customers
298
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
6%

4 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for thegazette.co.uk.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Gazette holds a unique market position as the UK's official public record publisher with a long-standing history dating back to 1665. Its competitive advantage lies in government backing, authoritative content, and comprehensive data services. Revenue streams include paid notice placements, data subscriptions, and sales of commemorative publications. The target customer segments include legal professionals, businesses requiring official notices, researchers, and the general public. Growth indicators include digital service offerings and data services expansion. The partnership ecosystem includes The National Archives and TSO, enhancing credibility and operational support. Strategic observations highlight the importance of maintaining trust, expanding digital services, and improving transparency around security and compliance.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, cookie consent management, and no visible exposure of sensitive data. The use of Matomo Analytics with consent respects user privacy. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response plan, and vulnerability disclosure process indicates gaps in security transparency and readiness. Security headers are not evident, which could be improved to enhance protection against common web attacks. The site shows no signs of vulnerabilities or malicious content. Compliance with GDPR is indicated through privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the security maturity is good but would benefit from formalized policies and enhanced technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and compliance.
  2. Implement and publicize an incident response and vulnerability disclosure process.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and dependencies.
  5. Enhance mobile optimization and site performance for improved user experience.

Contact details published on the site

Registration number
company notices
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
TSO (The Stationery Office)
Description
The Gazette is the UK's official public record since 1665, published by TSO under the superintendence of His Majesty's Stationery Office (HMSO), part of The National Archives. It provides official notices including insolvency, wills and probate, company information, awards and accreditations, and historical records.
Key services
Official public notices publication, Data service for company and insolvency information, Notice placement services, Archival search and historical records, Awards and accreditation listings
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Matomo Analytics, RequireJS, Modernizr, Five9 Social Widget
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of analytics with consent management

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation.
  2. Strong government affiliation and trust signals.
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy mechanisms implemented.
  4. No security policy or incident response information publicly available.
  5. No WHOIS data available due to domain registration restrictions.
  6. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and analytics with consent.
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  8. Good content safety rating; suitable for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based front-end with RequireJS for module loading and Modernizr for feature detection. Analytics are handled via Matomo with a clear consent mechanism, supplemented by Google Tag Manager. The site includes a live chat widget from Five9, indicating customer support integration. CSS and JS assets are versioned and loaded asynchronously, suggesting good performance practices. However, no CMS or hosting provider information is discernible. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and accessibility, with good SEO metadata including Open Graph and Twitter Card tags. Technical risks include reliance on third-party scripts without visible security headers and moderate mobile optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 82/100Low23 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with thegazette.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review thegazette.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.