Skip to main content

Security report for thefoodmaker.com

Foodmaker · E-commerce · Belgium

High risk. 6 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

41/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Foodmaker is a well-established healthy food company founded in 2003, operating in Belgium and neighboring countries. They provide a variety of services including meal delivery, healthy food restaurants, retail food bars, and a lifestyle brand called FDMKR. The website is professionally designed with good content quality and consistent branding. Technically, the site uses modern frameworks and multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools, with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and domain transfer protection, but lacks DNSSEC and explicit security headers. Privacy compliance is strong with clear policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the business appears credible and trustworthy with a solid digital presence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching thefoodmaker.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
20
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
68
Average
41

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Foodmaker targets health-conscious consumers seeking convenient, ready-made healthy meals and lifestyle products. Their business model combines direct-to-consumer e-commerce, physical restaurant operations, and retail partnerships. The company maintains a multi-channel presence including a B2B portal and lifestyle brand, indicating diversified revenue streams. Their market position is that of a regional leader in healthy food services with a consistent brand image and active social media engagement. Partnerships with retail chains and a dedicated lifestyle brand enhance their ecosystem and customer reach.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and has domain transfer protection, which are positive security indicators. However, the absence of DNSSEC and lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options represent areas for improvement. The use of multiple third-party scripts increases the attack surface and necessitates regular security audits. No incident response or security policy pages were found, indicating potential gaps in transparency and preparedness. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced with additional controls and policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to prevent supply chain attacks.
  4. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan to improve transparency and preparedness.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimization to improve user experience and search rankings.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Foodmaker
Description
Foodmaker is a healthy food company that makes healthy food as accessible as possible. They deliver vegetable-rich dishes to customers' doors and operate healthy food restaurants and bars. They also have a lifestyle brand called FDMKR.
Key services
Meal delivery service, Healthy food restaurants, Healthy food bars in retail stores, Lifestyle brand (FDMKR)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Owl Carousel, Slick Carousel, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Weglot (translation)
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, LinkedIn Analytics, Facebook Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Marketing tools
Weglot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multiple service offerings.
  2. Strong presence of privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  3. Multiple social media channels linked and active.
  4. Use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools.
  5. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  6. Domain registration data supports legitimacy and business history.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of jQuery, Bootstrap, Owl Carousel, Slick, and other popular JavaScript libraries, indicating a mature but somewhat traditional tech stack. Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, and Weglot are integrated for analytics, marketing, and multilingual support. The site is hosted under a domain registered with Combell NV, a reputable Belgian registrar. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. Some technical debt is evident in the use of older jQuery versions and lack of advanced accessibility features. Opportunities exist to modernize the stack and improve performance and security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with thefoodmaker.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review thefoodmaker.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.