Skip to main content

Security report for thefa.com

The Football Association · Government · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Football Association (The FA) is the official governing body of English football, managing national teams, competitions such as the Emirates FA Cup, and grassroots football initiatives. The website serves as a comprehensive portal for news, fixtures, results, governance, and educational resources, targeting football fans, players, coaches, referees, and volunteers. The FA holds a prominent market position as the authoritative source for football in England, operating as a large non-profit organization with a long-established history since 1863. Technically, the website is built on the Sitecore CMS platform and utilizes a modern tech stack including jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, and OneTrust for cookie consent management. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices, although performance is moderate. The presence of multiple external partner domains and integration with recognized marketing and analytics tools indicates a mature digital infrastructure. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS with excellent SSL configuration and employs a robust cookie consent mechanism. While explicit security headers are not visibly present in the HTML, no exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. The site follows best practices in data protection and privacy compliance, including GDPR adherence. Overall, the website presents a high level of professionalism, trustworthiness, and compliance, with clear navigation and rich content. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, maintaining up-to-date libraries, and improving incident response transparency to further strengthen the security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
63/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching thefa.com

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
70
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
63
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The FA operates as a non-profit governing body in the sports sector, specifically football in England. Its business model focuses on governance, competition management, education, and community engagement rather than direct commercial revenue. The organization benefits from strong partnerships with major brands such as Nike, Emirates, and EE, and maintains a broad ecosystem of related sites and services. The target audience spans from grassroots participants to professional players and fans. The FA's market position is dominant within English football, supported by its historical legacy and comprehensive service offerings. Growth indicators include active community programs, educational initiatives, and digital engagement through multiple platforms. The partnership ecosystem includes official sponsors, ticketing services, and educational platforms, reinforcing its authoritative role in the industry.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS enforcement and excellent SSL configuration. The use of OneTrust for cookie consent ensures compliance with privacy regulations. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive information were found in the HTML content. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. The site employs secure third-party scripts and analytics tools, minimizing risk from external dependencies. Incident response and security policy information are not prominently available, indicating a potential gap in transparency. Overall, the security culture appears strong, but enhancing header policies and incident response visibility would further improve resilience and trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Regularly update and audit third-party libraries and scripts to prevent exploitation of known vulnerabilities.
  3. Enhance transparency by publishing clear security policies and incident response procedures accessible to users and stakeholders.
  4. Ensure all forms and input fields have robust CSRF and input validation protections to prevent injection attacks.
  5. Develop a long-term security strategy incorporating continuous monitoring, penetration testing, and user awareness training.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
The Football Association
Description
Official website of The Football Association (The FA), governing body of English football, providing news, competitions, rules, governance, and information about England football teams.
Key services
Football governance, Competition management, Education and learning, Community and inclusion programs, Ticketing and merchandise
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.12.4, jQuery UI 1.12.1, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, OneTrust Cookie Consent, Scarab Research, eCal Widget, Stackla
Frameworks
Sitecore CMS
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS
  • Cookie consent management via OneTrust
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure external scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdSense
Tracking pixels
Hotjar, OneTrust
Marketing tools
Emarsys Tag Manager, Stackla, eCal Widget
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. The website is the official platform for The Football Association, providing comprehensive information about English football.
  2. Strong use of third-party services for analytics, consent management, and advertising.
  3. Clear navigation structure with extensive submenu items covering all aspects of the organization and its competitions.
  4. Robust cookie consent mechanism implemented via OneTrust.
  5. No signs of WAF or content blocking; full content is accessible.
  6. Multiple external links to official partners and related football organizations.
  7. No exposed sensitive data or obvious security vulnerabilities in the HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Sitecore CMS platform, leveraging a combination of jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, and OneTrust for analytics and consent management. The infrastructure appears robust with integration of multiple third-party services for marketing, tracking, and user engagement. Performance is moderate, with potential optimization opportunities in script loading and resource management. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices evident in meta tags and structured navigation. Technical risks are minimal but include the need for updated security headers and continuous monitoring of third-party dependencies to avoid technical debt and security vulnerabilities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with thefa.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review thefa.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.