Skip to main content

Security report for theconversation.com

The Conversation · Media · N/a

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Conversation is a well-established media platform founded in 2003, specializing in delivering in-depth academic analysis, research, and news to a broad audience interested in scholarly insights. The platform leverages professional editorial curation and contributions from leading academics, positioning itself as a reputable source of informed commentary on global issues. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including React with Next.js, Google Tag Manager for analytics, and a robust cookie consent mechanism via Didomi, ensuring compliance with GDPR and enhancing user privacy. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices, contributing to a positive user experience. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and employs best practices in data handling, though it lacks explicit security policies and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. The WHOIS data confirms domain legitimacy with a long registration history and transparent registration details. Overall, the website scores well on content quality, technical implementation, security posture, privacy compliance, and business credibility, making it a trustworthy and professional platform for academic news and analysis.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of theconversation.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching theconversation.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
50
Email security
87
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention theconversation.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1,626
Employees
2
Customers
1,585
Third parties
39
Weak passwords
11%

Latest record dated 2025-12-04 · 9 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for theconversation.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –theconversation.com2025-12-04
  • –theconversation.com2025-10-29

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Conversation operates in the media and education sectors, targeting a global audience interested in academic research and analysis. Its business model centers on publishing curated content from academics, supported by professional editors, and distributing newsletters to engage readers. The platform's market position is strong due to its unique blend of academic rigor and journalistic flair. Revenue streams likely include advertising and partnerships, though no explicit affiliate or ad network programs were detected beyond Google Tag Manager. The company maintains a consistent brand identity and high content quality, reinforcing trust and authority in its niche. Partnerships include social media presence on Facebook, enhancing reach and engagement. The absence of explicit contact information and terms of service may be areas for improvement to bolster business transparency.

Security posture

The Conversation exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced site-wide, use of modern frameworks, and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. However, the absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure channels represents a compliance gap. DNSSEC is not enabled, which could be improved to enhance DNS security. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. Security headers are implied but not explicitly visible in the HTML snippet, suggesting potential for enhancement. Overall, the site maintains a secure environment suitable for its content and audience but would benefit from formalizing security governance and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and compliance.
  3. Implement and publicly expose a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Explicitly configure and verify security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Add clear business contact information including emails and phone numbers to enhance trust and user support.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
The Conversation
Description
The Conversation offers curated, informed commentary and debate on global issues, with a focus on academic and research insights.
Key services
Curated academic articles, News analysis, Newsletter distribution
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React (Next.js), Google Tag Manager, Didomi Consent Management, Webpack
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of modern JavaScript frameworks

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content
  2. Strong academic and editorial focus
  3. Good privacy and cookie consent implementation
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on main page
  5. No visible terms of service page linked
  6. Modern web technologies used
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  8. No explicit security or incident response policies found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React-based framework (Next.js) with server-side rendering capabilities, enhancing performance and SEO. It uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and Didomi for consent management, reflecting a mature approach to user privacy and data handling. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations. Hosting details are not explicitly disclosed but DNS and registrar data indicate a stable infrastructure. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed and resource optimization. The absence of a known CMS suggests a custom or proprietary content management solution. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a high-quality user experience with opportunities for further modernization and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 76/100 +1Low27 findingsView report
  2. 75/100Medium28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with theconversation.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review theconversation.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.